This research states that incarceration doesn't reform a criminal. He has spent almost half his life in prison but the time there didn't reform him, he continues to commit crimes. He is probably never going to be a law-abiding citizen by now, if he most likely hasn't finished high school, never had a real job nor could get one with his prison record.
The research doesn't explain neither why he started committing crimes, if it was because he has some form of mental illness, or perhaps because of a poor upbring and background, the lack of hard-working role models. If the reasons of why he started committing crimes were treated, maybe he would stop doing so.
President Roosevelt never was able to escape his need for southern political support, which tainted the new deal with a legacy of failing to address racial injustice.
The New Deal refers to a set of domestic policies initiated by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the United States between 1933 and 1939. They included institutions and programs designed to bring relief to various sections like the unemployed, youths, elderly, farmers, and labor. It also strengthened state oversight over the banking sector and fiscal policies. .
To ensure southern political support for his programs, he had to refrain from actively promoting civil rights or anti-lynchings laws to protect the blacks. This tainted the legacy of the New Deal which neglected the issue of racial injustice.
To learn more about the New Deal: brainly.com/question/22480124
#SPJ4
Answer:
the answer is C popular sovereignty
Answer:
a. When participants could choose the level of shock, they administered very low levels
Explanation:
Migram experiment is known as Milgram shock experiment. And this experiment focused on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. This means that, it explained how personal conscience use to fight with the obedience to authority.
The experiment was intended to observe how far the participants were willing to obey the experimenter, even though what they were doing was morally wrong.
In a nutshell, Milgram reached the conclusion that a majority of individuals will continue to obey authority figures even if the individuals believe the acts to be wrong.
