Were there any answer choices for it? If not it would just be they wouldn't get a lot of laws or bills passed because of Congressional opposition.
Answer:
Mischel proposed that behaviors are determined mostly by "SITUATIONAL CUES". Up to that point, psychologists in his field had believed that "TRAITS" were responsible for a person’s behavior. Mischel’s idea has come to be called "MISCHEL'S COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE PERSONALITY MODEL", and the debate over it is known as the "PERSON"/situation debate.
Explanation:
Previously existing trait theories suggests that a person's behavior depends on his/her traits, and they are consistent in different situations.
Walter Mischel criticized this theory and suggests that the way people behave is determined by the situation they find themselves in, and not just the traits they possess. His idea is known as "Mischel's cognitive-affective personality model".
The debate between Mischel and the proponent of trait theories is called the "trait vs state" or the Person-Situation debate.
Answer:
stare decisis
Explanation:
In law, stare decisis can be described as a situation in which historical cases are used for forming a rule when a similar case is seen. In this type of system, rules are formed in consideration of the previous rules which were acknowledged for a similar case. Stare decisis simply means to stand by what is already decided. The principle of stare decisis is the core of U.S common law. All court relies on U.S supreme court precedents.
Answer: true
Explanation:
adams-onís treaty, agreement between the usa and spain. negotiated by secretary of state john quincy adams and spanish minister luis de onís, spain gave up its land of the mississippi river and claims to the oregon territory. 「the us assumed debts of us 5$ million and gave up claims to texas」
The answers would be Kenya because
