All categories

3 years ago

(-4,2) is a solution to the following graph. True or False?

Mathematics

1 answer:

emmasim [6.3K]3 years ago

5 0

Plugging in the values of (-4,2) into the two inequality statements to see whether it is part of the solution to the inequality system:

y ≥ -5x + 3
2 ≥ -5(-4) + 3
2 ≥ 20 + 3
2 ≥ 23 (false statement).

For the other inequality statement, substitute 2 for the y value:

y > -2
2 > -2 (true statement).

Since (-4,2) only satisfies one of the inequality statements, then it means that it is not a solution to the graph.

Therefore, the correct answer is FALSE.

Please mark my answers as the Brainliest if you find my explanation helpful :)

You might be interested in

A small pizza at Little Italy pizzeria costs $9.25, and each topping is an additional $0.50. So the cost of ordering a pizza can

Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

Graph the equation is shown below.

Step-by-step explanation:

The linear equation representing the relation between cost of ordering a pizza and the number of additional toppings is:

$y=0.50x+9.25$

Here,

y = cost of the pizza

x = number of toppings

The graph of the linear equation is shown below.

Consider the point (2, 10.25).

When x = 2 compute the value of y as follows:

$y=0.50x+9.25\\=(0.50\times 2)+9.25\\=10.25$

The point (2, 10.25) satisfies the equation.

Again consider a point (18, 18.25).

When x = 18 compute the value of y as follows:

$y=0.50x+9.25\\=(0.50\times 18)+9.25\\=18.25$

The point (18, 18.25) satisfies the equation.

The two points are also plotted on the graph.

6 0

3 years ago

I HAVE 5 MINUTES PLZ HELP! (Multiple choice)

Gemiola [76]

Answer:

i think its B or A

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Cx=r/d<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Br%7D%7Bd%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="\frac{r}{d}" alt="\frac{r}{d}" align="abs

antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

$x=\frac{rc}{d}$

Step-by-step explanation:

ill take the equation as this

$cx=\frac{r}{d}$

divide both side by c

$\mathrm{Apply\:the\:fraction\:rule}:\quad \frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}}=\frac{a\cdot \:c}{b}$

Next time when you see someone greif your question, please report it.

Shame for the other guy

Hoped this helped you

Red

8 0

3 years ago

Ez pts

Kobotan [32]

Answer:

well first 312 in radical form is √312 and that simplified is 2√78 or 17.66352173

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Calcium is an essential nutrient for strong bones and for controlling blood pressure and heart beat. Because most of the body’s

irakobra [83]

Answer:

No, because the 95% confidence interval contains the hypothesized value of zero.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

You have the information regarding two calcium supplements.

X₁: Calcium content of supplement 1

n₁= 12

X[bar]₁= 1000mg

S₁= 23 mg

X₂: Calcium content of supplement 2

n₂= 15

X[bar]₂= 1016mg

S₂= 24mg

It is known that X₁~N(μ₁; σ²₁), X₂~N(μ₂;δ²₂) and σ²₁=δ²₂=?

The claim is that both supplements have the same average calcium content:

H₀: μ₁ - μ₂ = 0

H₁: μ₁ - μ₂ ≠ 0

α: 0.05

The confidence level and significance level are to be complementary, so if 1 - α: 0.95 then α:0.05

since these are two independent samples from normal populations and the population variances are equal, you have to use a pooled variance t-test to construct the interval:

[(X[bar]₁-X[bar]₂) ± $t_{n_1+n_2-2;1-\alpha /2}$ * $Sa*\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} }$ ]

$t_{n_1+n_2-2;1-/2}= t_{25;0.975}= 2.060$

$Sa= \sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)S^2_1+(n_2-1)S^2_2}{n_1+n_2-2} }= \sqrt{\frac{11*529+14*576}{12+15-2} } = 23.57$

[(1000-1016)±2.060*23.57* $\sqrt{\frac{1}{12} +\frac{1}{15} }$ ]

[-34.80;2.80] mg

The 95% CI contains the value under the null hypothesis: "zero", so the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis. Then using a 5% significance level you can conclude that there is no difference between the average calcium content of supplements 1 and 2.

I hope it helps!

3 0

3 years ago