I believe the answer is: inductive reasoning
In inductive reasoning, the premises would be viewed as some sort of supply of evidence for the general conclusion. In the example above,
"all professional athletes earn a lot of money" is the premise that is used as some sort of evidence for " wes makes a lot of money", which is the speaker's conclusion.
This is true. She can learn the rules of the game, terms used, top tennis players, types of courts played on, the various tournaments, her favorite players.
Many people cannot play sports very well but still can be avid fans of the sport! Thank goodness!
Answer:
P = MR = 1
Explanation:
The demand function is q = 25 - 12p.
The total income is the price of potatoes multiplied by the quantities of potato --> P * Q
p*q = p*(25-12p)
p*q = 25p - 12p^2
the first derivative of the previous equation is the marginal revenue. In perfect competition the Price = Marginal revenue.
First derivative of total income ---> 25-24p
And MR = P
25-24p=p
25=25p
<h2>p=1</h2>
<em><u>gente</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>não</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>tem</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>que</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>fazer</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>prova</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>de</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>amanhã</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>de</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>manha</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>cedo</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>né</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
Answer:
$9,097
Explanation:
Net cash flow from operating activities = + $47,042
Net cash flow from investing activities = - $21,831
Net cash flow from financing activities = - $28,397
Net cash flows for the period = - $3,186
Beginning cash account balance = $12,283
Net cash flows for the period = - $3,186
Ending cash balance = $9,097