Hello!
from the list, the answer would be <u>marijuana</u>
the most used that is not from the list is methamphetamine
I hope this helps, and have a nice day!
Answer:
<u>possibly</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
We use the term the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could possibly be relied on because, if the court deemed that there's considerable evidence there was a probability that the bottler was negligent with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda.
However, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on if there's evidence of an absence of negligence by the bottler with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda. <em>In other words, evidence shows that there's a greater probability that the waitress may have mishandled the bottle of soda or was negligent in some way leading her injuries.</em>
Answer:
Power must be used to offset power
Explanation:
In Montesquieu's mind, in the principle of checks and balances, the powers of the state would be divided into: Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary. The legislature has the typical function of legislating and overseeing; the executive, to administer the public thing; the judiciary, judging, applying the law to a specific case before it, resulting from a conflict of interest. Applying the Brake and Balance System means restraining the abuses of other powers to maintain a certain balance. For example, the judiciary, by declaring the unconstitutionality of a law is a brake on the Legislative act that could contain arbitrariness, to the point that the balance is that all powers have different functions, thus, not having a hierarchy between them, making them harmonic and independent powers.
For this reason, we can conclude that the principle of brakes and counterweights is based on the notion that power must be used to offset power.
The <u>ABA</u> has stated that, unlike attorneys, expert witnesses do not owe a duty of loyalty to their clients.
