19. Which of the following evidence would always be admissible in-court?

Law

1 answer:

Drupady [299]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

"Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i.e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."

Explanation:

You might be interested in

How learning new things can be turned into an opportunity

Akimi4 [234]

Answer: When you learn something new you are exercising your brain, which can help improve cognitive functions such as concentration, attention to detail, memory recall, and problem-solving, and also reduce the chance of developing dementia. Also learning new skills is essential to advancing your career. It diversifies your job options and helps you develop new techniques to keep up with the fast-changing world.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

What is rifling ? What two types of markings does this produce ?

grin007 [14]

Answer:

Rifling stands for the spiral grooves in the gun put by the manufacturer. And the two types of markings are the grooves land on the bullet.It is the process of figuring out the distance between the gun and its target. And it is done by looking at the patterns of the shot and the gun remainings.

Explanation:

Please mark as brainliest

6 0

3 years ago

Which statement describes judicial restraint? Justices rely on the ideas of Congress and the president when deciding cases. Just

STALIN [3.7K]

Answer:

the correct answer is 2.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers