1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
skad [1K]
3 years ago
14

19. Which of the following evidence would always be admissible in-court?

Law
1 answer:
Drupady [299]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

"Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i.e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who proposed 30 different suggestions for why crime remained high in some areas even when there was high population turn-over?
dedylja [7]
The answer is Rodney Stark
6 0
3 years ago
What are some fun facts about being a lawyer? I'll give brainliest!
Hitman42 [59]

Something cool I was told as a child was "tell the lawyer the truth so they can lie"

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Nikita just graduated from college and wants to go into a career with INTERPOL as law enforcement personnel. Where might she exp
Y_Kistochka [10]
It’s either B or D id say definitely B however
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hsu was indicted for violating the Economic Espio- nage Act by conspiring to steal corporate trade secrets for an anti-cancer dr
loris [4]

Answer:

Hsu was indicted for violating the Economic Espio- nage Act by conspiring to steal corporate trade secrets for an anti-cancer drug. The defense requested a copy of the trade secret documents. The government contended that the defense did not need access to the documents except under supervision of the judge. The defense maintained a right of full access to the documents so the defense of impossibil- ity could be established, meaning Hsu could not steal trade secrets that did not exist. District court agreed with the defense; government appealed. Must the defendant be allowed full access to trade secrets that are a key part of a case? [U.S. v. Hsu, 155 F. 3d 189, 3rd Cir. (1998)]

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What is a general partnership
saveliy_v [14]
“A business organization where all partners are general partners who have unlimited liability and equal management authority”
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you think anything from your vehicle check could affect your safety or ability to control your car, you should _____.
    5·2 answers
  • One way government solves problems is by
    7·2 answers
  • WILL MAKR BRAINLIEST
    9·2 answers
  • Which one of the following statements regarding the right to freedom of association is correct?
    12·1 answer
  • What is an executive agreement?
    14·1 answer
  • Under what circumstances might it be legally justifiable to search students before allowing them entry into a school sports even
    8·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST!!
    10·1 answer
  • Why is there no one clear definition for a political conservative
    7·1 answer
  • Describe the secret that felt like a knife cutting into Brian why was this thought so upsetting to him?
    5·1 answer
  • When you are driving on a highway, signals of intentions to turn right or left shall be given:
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!