19. Which of the following evidence would always be admissible in-court?

Law

1 answer:

Drupady [299]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

"Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i.e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Which is the most important idea that should be embraced?

worty [1.4K]

A copy of Trotha's Extermination Order survives in the Botswana National Archives. The order states "every Herero, with or without a gun, with or without cattle, will be shot. I will no longer accept women or children, I will drive them back to their people [to die in the desert] or let them be shot at."

8 0

3 years ago

In the U.S.,The South Carolina state constitution is the supreme law of the land?

Artemon [7]

I’m pretty sure it’s false but not 100% sure

8 0

2 years ago

The procedure in which the prosecutor and defense adorney question potential jurors to pick a jury is known as which of the foll

lorasvet [3.4K]

The answer is Voir dire.

8 0

3 years ago