1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
skad [1K]
3 years ago
14

19. Which of the following evidence would always be admissible in-court?

Law
1 answer:
Drupady [299]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

"Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i.e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What was to be added for the Anti-Federalists to ratify
aivan3 [116]
Your mom house naps Manama with
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why should a Notary Signing Agent learn about all the closing documents in a loan package if they are not allowed to provide adv
Olenka [21]

Answer:

search

Explanation:

it

4 0
3 years ago
You are a defense attorney defending a client against a murder charge. Your client is the former boyfriend of the victim, and it
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

- move for a new trial—that is, ask the judge to set aside the jury’s verdict, declare a mistrial, and start over, or

- appeal or seek a writ, which means asking a higher court to reverse a conviction (court of appeal)

- could possibly hire a private detective to review the case to see if there is any evidence to show he is innocent, if this is successful, a retrial can be put in place?

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
In the event you get pulled over for a traffic stop, describe the situation from the police officer's perspective and list at le
natita [175]
Just listen to what they’re saying and do it
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Cases such as Loving v. Virginia and Griswold v. Connecticut illustrate that:______
Paraphin [41]

This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.

Cases such as Loving v. Virginia and Griswold v. Connecticut illustrate that:______

a) the Supreme Court will rarely strike down laws passed directly by voters through the initiative process

b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution

c) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to overturn state statutes

d) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to strike down sections of state constitutions

Answer: b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution

Explanation:

In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court ruled the anti-miscegenation statutes that outlawed interracial marriage, such as was the case in Virginia, unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment.

In Griswold v. State of Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Connecticut’s birth control law was unconstitutional because it infringed the Fourth and Fifth amendments

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are the purposes of political parties? Please give an example
    9·1 answer
  • To be effective, an offer must be communicated to the
    10·1 answer
  • The court official who has the power to decide federal bankruptcy cases is
    13·1 answer
  • True or false jury duty is required at the federal and state level​
    6·2 answers
  • How do lawmakers feel about lobbyists?
    8·1 answer
  • State a proposal on reducing the risk of wrongful convictions
    15·1 answer
  • Why would intellectual property theft fit the mission of private technology security and possibly be more applicable than it is
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP 100 POINTS !!!!
    9·2 answers
  • Is brainly bad at their job
    5·2 answers
  • Phoenix was found guilty as charged; however, the judge deferred imprisonment and stipulated court supervision and demonstration
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!