I believe it was, "<span>Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong." But I'm not quite sure. </span>
1. The main conclusion of this argument is the increase in tractor-trailer rig accidents is due to driver inexperience.
2. The number of intermediate conclusions is one. They are first, graduates do not get enough hands-on training before receiving their driving certifications.
3. The number of basic reasons is Three. Firstly, There is a greater demand for truck drivers. Secondly, Driver training schools have shortened their courses, and lastly, Graduates do not get enough hands-on training.
4. The structure of the reasons for the main conclusion is linked.
- The Intermediate conclusion is the assertion that the remainder of the argument supports or that we are led to assume is true by the rest of the argument. The information provided in the second phrase serves to support this summarization of the first sentence's key idea.
- Linked premises also known as "connected" premises logically depend on one another and cooperate to establish a conclusion; in other words, they depend on one another. One of the dependent premises is frequently indicated by the argument's context rather than being stated directly. Enthymemes, or "hidden premises/assumptions," are what are known as these hidden premises.
Learn more about conclusions here:
brainly.com/question/11616885
#SPJ9
Congress would most likely rely on the following:
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution declares the laws of the Constitution as supreme over state laws. In the case of conflict, federal law takes precedence over state laws and state constitutions. This cqn be found in Article 6, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution.
States would most likely rely on:
The nullification theory allowing states to nullify federal laws they find as unconstitutional, or interposition the right of a state to interpose between the states citizens and the federal government.
