Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Try dividing the first equation by 3. The result will be identical to the second equation. Thus, we have two lines that coincide, and therefore there are an infinite number of solutions.
Let

where we assume |r| < 1. Multiplying on both sides by r gives

and subtracting this from
gives

As n → ∞, the exponential term will converge to 0, and the partial sums
will converge to

Now, we're given


We must have |r| < 1 since both sums converge, so


Solving for r by substitution, we have


Recalling the difference of squares identity, we have

We've already confirmed r ≠ 1, so we can simplify this to

It follows that

and so the sum we want is

which doesn't appear to be either of the given answer choices. Are you sure there isn't a typo somewhere?
m
=
−
2
, (
3,
5
)
Find the value of b
using the formula for the equation of a line.
b
=
11
Now that the values of
m (slope) and b
(y-intercept) are known, substitute them into
y
=
m
x
+
b to find the equation of the line. y
=
−
2
x
+
11
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = (x - 2)(x - 5)x(x+ 7)
f(x) = (x^2 - 7x + 10)*x * (x + 7)
f(x) = x(x^3 - 39x + 70)
f(x) = x^4 - 39x^2 + 70x
To show that this is correct, I've made a graph with these points labeled. The graph is just around the x axis. The local maximums and minimums are just too large a value.
Answer:
27.9
Step-by-step explanation:
i googled it for you