The first bag would be 5.34$ and the second would be 5.53$ and the second bag is better cause your only spending 19 more cents for 1.5 more pounds
Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
Sides AB to DC aren't congruent/parallel
Sides BC to AD aren't congruent/parallel
Answer:
The inductive reasoning is based on A: a limited number of observations
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's say you lived until 90 years old, and took a observation on July 4th each year. Even if you lived until 90 years old, you would only have 90 observations. And inductive reasoning allows for statements to be false, so any of the 90 observations that you took can be proven false. So really, you would have only 90 observations, with any of them that could be false. A limited number of observations would be the only thing that you could base this reasoning off of.
The first one is the second one. t(n)=20n+480
Question 4: is the first one t(n)=8n+15
Answer:
16 0z/1 ib
Step-by-step explanation:
it is not a quantity over time
