Answer:
i would find her not guilty but in most cases they would most find her not guilty and put her on a less charge. but i would say shes not gulity because the guy was breaking an entry Ms.urbanski was proberly was scared what might happen to her. and plus if she is an older women she proberly cant fight for her self even if she did an average man can most likely take down and average woman. i would also say that Ms.Urbanski didnt know if he had a gun or not so her life could of been in danger and lastly if Ms.Urbanski had a clear criminal record which would make this her first incident this could save her from being convicted
Explanation:
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Office of Personnel Management - This office is responsible for the management of the civil service and is also responsible for employing new employees and managing their pensions and other retirement benefits.
The also ensure that insurance are provided to the government workers.
Merit System Protection Board - This ensures that there's an efrwctice and efficient workforce. It also ensures that excellent services are given to the citizens by the workers.
Office of the Government Ethics: It is charged with the responsibility of overseeing and guiding the government employees and ensuring that ethic laws are been maintained. It ensures that conflict of interest among employees are prevented.
These agencies are important because they ensure that the aims of the government are met through the provision of necessary materials to ensure improvement in workers productivity and conditions and also monitoring of employees to ensure that the goals of the government are met.
what do you mean by a new tag like a license plate if so, replacement is necessary because license plates must be fully reflectorized to ensure visibility for law enforcement purposes
Yes, I presume it’s True.
Explanation:
I don’t have a lot of experience with these questions although I did some research and found that according to the exact wording of Article III, Section 2, states: “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.” This I presume means the they did have original jurisdiction? Furthermore, if I think about this logically then, would they not be in charge of certain cases that might be severe or important that they wouldn’t let others know or help in?
I presume the answer is yes although you can choose anything you assume is correct. Btw I hope I helped a bit. Good luck!
C :))))))))))))))))))))))))))
