1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
charle [14.2K]
3 years ago
10

HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Law
1 answer:
Korvikt [17]3 years ago
3 0

In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed in response to the Enron and WorldCom scandals, offering broad protections for whistleblowers at public companies in order to encourage fraud reporting. Private companies were considered immune to the law.

But in 2014 the Supreme Court heard a challenge to SOX, and ruled that even though the plaintiffs were not employees of the publicly traded company, the SOX whistleblower statute applied to them. The reason? They suffered retaliation for reporting alleged fraud involving financial reporting of a publicly-traded company.

Here’s what the law now says:

SOX covers employees of a public company’s private contractors and subcontractors.

SOX covers privately-owned companies if they provide services for publicly-traded ones. Answer:

Explanation:

You might be interested in
(MC)Law enforcement begins with whom?
Anika [276]
I think it begins with the prosecutor...sorry if I’m wrong...:(
7 0
3 years ago
A police officer is struggling to arrest a man who has just assaulted a shopkeeper you see the police officer kneeling on the de
NikAS [45]

Answer:

I don't maybe because police officer is smart

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
***50 POINTS+BRAINLEST***
dimaraw [331]

Answer: violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection clause

Explanation:

Plessy claimed the law violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection clause, which requires that a state must not “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” The Supreme Court disagreed with Plessy's argument and instead upheld the Louisiana law.

7 0
2 years ago
What might an ideal Supreme Court look like?
Sonja [21]

Information:

An ideal Supreme Court may come accross as scary but, if we think about it it's like any other building. Ususally, it has many pillars suppoting it and is usually decorated in coulourless way.

Extra Information:

Here are some pictures for you to look at if you are stilll finding it difficult to imagine what a supreme court may look like

8 0
3 years ago
FILL IN THE BLANK. Jack violated a condition of his parole. This resulted in parole ________ and he was returned to prison.
vazorg [7]
A - Revocation. If a parolee has been accused of violating the terms of their parole, they may be remanded to the custody of the Department of Correction and the Revocation process with the Board of Pardons and Paroles will begin.
8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Jacinda makes collections on real estate loans. Last year, she made approximately 20 collections and collected $38,000. Must Jac
    11·1 answer
  • Instead of directly addressing the problem, an abuser will medicate it away by indirectly denying its impact for a short while.
    13·1 answer
  • One of the mistakes that was made in both the JonBenet Ramsey and Lizzie Borden cases was:
    5·1 answer
  • Which amendment is most responsible for protecting citizens' liberties from intrusion by state governments?
    7·1 answer
  • Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law.with specific references to the law of contact.discuss
    10·1 answer
  • Compare valid, void, voidable, and unenforceable contracts. Give a brief definition of each
    13·1 answer
  • Your judgement is not affected by your emotions? True or false
    9·2 answers
  • How many seats are on the Supreme Court?
    5·2 answers
  • Pls hurry i will mark the brainliest has to be right 20 points!!
    5·1 answer
  • What is the role of the third party in mediation?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!