Answer:
Internal validity
Step-by-step explanation:
The internal validity here is weak
Internal validity describes the extent to which an evidence weighs the cause and effect claim. In this study, the internal validity that brought about failure in the new exam is mainly due to the environment where the exam was written and not the new exam itself.
So this validity is weak in claiming that the new exam is not a good substitute for the old exam.
Putting them in the same good environment might help the researchers to draw a better conclusion.
Answer:
3 with a few left over so 4
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
9) PQR Is an isosceles triangle
=> ∠PRQ = (180° - x)/2
PRS is an isosceles right triangle
=> ∠PRS = 45°
Have: ∠PRS + ∠PRQ = 115°
=> 
=> 180 - x = (115 - 45).2 = 140
<=> x = 180 - 140 = 40
10) ABD is an isosceles right triangle => ∠ABD = 45°
BCD is an equilateral triangle => ∠CBD = 60°
have: x = ∠ABD + ∠CBD = 45° + 60° = 105°
11) have: x = y (2)
PQT is an isosceles triangle => ∠PQT = 180 - 70.2 = 40
QTS is an isosceles triangle => ∠TQS = 180 -2x
QRS is an isosceles triangle => ∠RSQ = y
have: 40 + 180 - 2x + y = 180 => 2x - y = 40 (1)
(1)(2) => 
=> x + y = 80
12) EFJ Is an equilateral triangle => ∠FJE = 60
∠FJE is the outer angle of the triangle FHJ but FHJ is an isosceles triangle
=> 60 = 2.∠JHF => ∠JHF = 30°
∠JHF is the outer angle of the triangle FHG
=> 30° = 2x
<=> x = 15°
slope = y2-y1 over x2-x1
-1 - 4= -5
-8-0 - -8
so you get -5/-8
negative divided by negative = positive
slope = 5/8