A is the answer. It has no repeating x points buy it repeats on the y coordinate, which is okay. The answer is A just to say it again.
Answer: 3000 multiplied by 0.05
and u get you get the 0.05 by dividing 5 by 100.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
3000 600
5000 1000
6000 1200
7500 1500
No it doesn't form a proportional relationship because yes, the ratio is constant AFTER the 5,000, you do need to hit the 5,000 first, and then it changes. So no, it's not proportional because it isn't constant throughout the entirety of the relationship. If you're just going based on the table in question, then yes it will be proportional since it doesn't have the 5,000 in it but if you're looking at it in it's entirety, no it's not.
The correct question is
<span>
Penelope determined the solutions of the quadratic function by completing the square.f(x) = 4x² + 8x + 1
–1 = 4x² + 8x
–1 = 4(x² + 2x)
–1 + 1 = 4(x² + 2x + 1)
0 = 4(x + 2)²
0 = (x + 2)²
0 = x + 2
–2 = x
What error did Penelope make in her work?
we have that
</span>f(x) = 4x² + 8x + 1
to find the solutions of the quadratic function
let
f(x)=0
4x² + 8x + 1=0
Group terms that contain the same variable, and move the
constant to the opposite side of the equation
(4x² + 8x)=-1
Factor the
leading coefficient
4*(x² + 2x)=-1
Complete the square Remember to balance the equation
by adding the same constants to each side.
4*(x² + 2x+1)=-1+4 --------> ( added 4 to both sides)
Rewrite as perfect squares
4*(x+1)²=3
(x+1)²=3/4--------> (+/-)[x+1]=√3/2
(+)[x+1]=√3/2---> x1=(√3/2)-1----> x1=(√3-2)/2
(-)[x+1]=√3/2----> x2=(-2-√3)/2
therefore
the answer is
<span>
Penelope should have added 4 to both sides instead of adding 1.</span>
