Answer:
Part a. The graph does not model a proportional relationship.
Part b. The values in table model a proportional relation.
3.5 minutes per mile.
Step-by-step explanation:
Part a.
The graph shown in the question representing Janet's data is not a straight line although it passes through the origin.
That is why the rate of change of distance with time is not constant.
Therefore, the graph does not model a proportional relationship.
Part b.
If we plot the data in the table using distance in miles along the y-axis and time in minutes along the x-axis, then we will get a straight line passing through the origin.
So, the values in the table model a proportional relation.
Now, Tarik's unit rate in minutes per miles will be
minutes per mile. (Answer)
Answer:
263,870
Step-by-step explanation:
I think its A once again i THINK its A sorry if im wrong
<span />
Answer:
h t t p s : / / w w w . y o u t u b e . c o m / w a t c h ? v = i i k 2 5 w q I u F o
Explanation:
heres a video on the topic (it also gives the answer) (delete the spaces)
Answer:
21
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the mean, add up all the numbers
15+15+25+29 =84
Divide by the number of numbers
84/4 = 21