Explanation:
In mediation, parties agree to work together, but under the guidance of a trained mediator. ... Through negotiation, parties are able to bind themselves in an agreement. A mediator, on the other hand, doesn't have decision-making power and doesn't hand down a ruling like an arbitrator or a judge might.
Explanation:
<h3>The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle stated succinctly that "laws should govern". In simple terms, democracy focuses on how societies select those who will hold power, while the rule of law is concerned with how political power is exercised. </h3><h3>The aim of rule of law like other constitutional principles is the uplifting of freedom and fundamental rights of the people. The rule of law has propounded to make sure that the executive doesn't use law of the land or country to oppress or curtail freedom of individuals as they are found in the bill of rights.</h3>
Answer:
Explanation:
It applys Because determinsim is the events of everything so it would be the use of everything.
Answer:
You can't ask for an essay to be written for you on Brainly, even if someone did write it for you it'd quickly be figured out when your teacher checks the contents of the essay for plagiarism.
Answer: C. The Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott was not entitled to the rights of citizenship, which inflamed sectional tensions that eventually led to the outbreak of the Civil War.
Details:
Dred Scott was a slave who had been owned by a Missouri man named John Emerson. Emerson's service in the US military caused him to live for a time in Illinois (which was a free state) and Wisconsin (which was a free territory. Later, back in Missouri, after John Emerson died, Scott tried to purchase his freedom from Emerson's widow, who refused. With lawyers' help, he then filed suit to gain his freedom on the grounds that he had lived in a free state and free territory.
In Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), commonly referred to simply as "The Dred Scott case," the Supreme Court, by a 7 to 2 margin, issued its ruling that Scott was not entitled to his freedom just because he had lived at some times in free territory. The Court also ruled that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States, and therefore did not have the legal standing to file such a lawsuit. The Court further stated that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 had been an overreach of federal government power -- that any states or territories were free to make their own decisions regarding slavery.
The Dred Scott decision was a controversial event which played into the tensions that by 1861 erupted into the Civil War in the United States.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/10791169#readmore
