1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeka57 [31]
3 years ago
5

Were the colonists justified in resisting British policies after the French and Indian War?

History
1 answer:
Vanyuwa [196]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

When the French and Indian War finally ended in 1763, no British subject on either side of the Atlantic could have foreseen the coming conflicts between the parent country and its North American colonies. Even so, the seeds of these conflicts were planted during, and as a result of, this war. Keep in mind that the French and Indian War (known in Europe as the Seven Years' War) was a global conflict. Even though Great Britian defeated France and its allies, the victory came at great cost. In January 1763, Great Britain's national debt was more than 122 million pounds [the British monetary unit], an enormous sum for the time. Interest on the debt was more than 4.4 million pounds a year. Figuring out how to pay the interest alone absorbed the attention of the King and his ministers.Nor was the problem of the imperial debt the only one facing British leaders in the wake of the Seven Years' War. Maintaining order in America was a significant challenge. Even with Britain's acquisition of Canada from France, the prospects of peaceful relations with the Native America tribes were not good. As a result, the British decided to keep a standing army in America. This decision would lead to a variety of problems with the colonists. In addition, an uprising on the Ohio frontier - Pontiac's Rebellion - led to the Proclamation of 1763, which forbade colonial settlement west of the Allegany Mountains. This, too, would lead to conflicts with land-hungry settlers and land speculators like George Washington (see map above).

British leaders also felt the need to tighten control over their empire. To be sure, laws regulating imperial trade and navigation had been on the books for generations, but American colonists were notorious for evading these regulations. They were even known to have traded with the French during the recently ended war. From the British point of view, it was only right that American colonists should pay their fair share of the costs for their own defense. If additional revenue could also be realized through stricter control of navigation and trade, so much the better. Thus the British began their attempts to reform the imperial system.

In 1764, Parliament enacted the Sugar Act, an attempt to raise revenue in the colonies through a tax on molasses. Although this tax had been on the books since the 1730s, smuggling and laxity of enforcement had blunted its sting. Now, however, the tax was to be enforced. An outcry arose from those affected, and colonists implemented several effective protest measures that centered around boycotting British goods. Then in 1765, Parliament enacted the Stamp Act, which placed taxes on paper, playing cards, and every legal document created in the colonies. Since this tax affected virtually everyone and extended British taxes to domestically produced and consumed goods, the reaction in the colonies was pervasive. The Stamp Act crisis was the first of many that would occur over the next decade and a half.

For additional documents related to these topics, search Loc.gov using such key words as Stamp Act, Indians, western lands, colonial trade, navigation, and the terms found in the documents. Another strategy is to browse relevant collections by date.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why were state constitutions significant when the U.S. constitution was written?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

first, they wanted a written constitution of rights

then, it would set limits on the power of the government

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best describes the executive branch of government under the Articles of Confederation? O It consisted of
natta225 [31]

Answer:

d is the answer

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Name 3 thing Mentuhotep II did with his reign in Egypt
Kay [80]

Answer:

1. In the 14th year of his reign, Mentuhotep launched a drive against Heracleopolis.

2. by 1968 at the latest, Mentuhotep had captured Heracleopolis and reunited Egypt.

3. Mentuhotep built temples at numerous Upper Egyptian sites, but little survives of them.

Explanation:

These are the answers I hope this Helps ❤️

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do authors of fiction stories teach readers?
Georgia [21]
Most fictional sources either have morals, or you'll often find that they actually have some historical accuracy i.e. they were influenced, the story will have a reflection of the author's opinions on the current situation when he wrote it.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Could be more than one answer
Alexus [3.1K]
Cant see so clearly
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement describes how the 2008 presidential election was unique in American history?
    13·2 answers
  • The men who led expeditions to conquer what today is mexico and central america became known as what
    10·1 answer
  • How did the transcontinental railroad affect US commerce? The railroad did not affect commerce in the United States. The railroa
    12·2 answers
  • What’s are some Effects that Lead up to the industrial revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • Which is a major reason why Greeks created art?
    14·2 answers
  • How could this document be used to explain important cause of European imperialism in Africa
    5·1 answer
  • HELP FAST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • Why did slavery start in the colonies?
    5·1 answer
  • WHAT DID YOU LEARN?
    8·1 answer
  • Before the fell out of fashion in the 1970's, over half the movies turned out by Hollywood were Westerns.
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!