Answer:
operant conditioning.
Explanation:
Operant conditioning is the term given to a learning method, where an individual is trained to exhibit specific behavior after an element is presented to him. When this individual exhibits the required behavior, he receives a reward, otherwise he receives a punishment.
In the example given in the question above, the cat Charlie underwent an operative conditioning process, as it was trained to be in the kitchen whenever it heard the noise of the electric can opener. When Charlie answered that noise, it got a food that it liked. For this reason, whenever it hears the noise, it goes to the kitchen waiting for the reward.
They are expressing "differential association".
Differential association, in criminology is a hypothesis created by Edwin Sutherland recommending that through interacting with others, people take in the qualities, dispositions, methods, and thought processes in criminal conduct. The differential association is the most discussed of the learning theories of deviance. This hypothesis centers around how people figure out how to end up wrongdoers, yet does not worry about why they move toward becoming offenders.
Answer:
The term is used in describing the amount of control or influence that consumers have on the market is sovereignty
Explanation:
Answer: In differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA), it is possible for the problem behavior and reinforced behaviour to coexist while in differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior (DRI), it is not.
Explanation:
Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) and differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior (DRI) are both ways to reduce or eliminate unsatisfactory behavior. They aim to change behavior by substituting unwanted behavior with target behavior and removing the reinforcement of unwanted behavior
.
The difference between DRA and DRI is the compatibility of the behavior that is being reinforced with the existing behavior. While DRA shows an alternative way to behave, DRI only reinforces behavior incompatible with the problem behavior. An example of DRA is is telling a student to raise her hand instead of shouting in class. Here, both of these behaviors are compatible. An example of DRI is telling a child who has a habit of talking while eating to do one or the other.
