Answer:
UN Security Council, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and Council of Europe.
Explanation:
According to the copernicus, the first duty of the astronomer is observation.
What did Copernicus believe?
Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543) was a mathematician and astronomer who proposed that the sun was stationary in the center of the universe and the earth revolved around it.
How was Copernicus theory proved?
- Galelio discovered evidence to support Copernicus' heliocentric theory when he observed four moons in orbit around Jupiter.
- Beginning on January 7, 1610, he mapped nightly the position of the 4 “Medicean stars” (later renamed the Galilean moons).
Learn more about Copernicus here:
brainly.com/question/9329429
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer that best fits into this sentence would be "denied the opportunity to obtain"
Explanation:
This is because Melvin Tumin was a firm believer on social stratification. This is a system that classifies people into different groups that depend on their wealth, income, social status and derived power. This makes it extremely difficult for underprivileged kids to achieve their dreams of becoming successful in a certain profession because in order to get to that level they need certain resources and contacts that are only available to higher class groups.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
At the conclusion of the War of 1812 in 1815, President James Madison requested Congressional approval for military action against the Barbary Pirates. ... He was killed at the beginning of the naval battle with Commodore Decatur's squadron on 17 June 1815 by an American broadside.The Second Barbary War (1815), under President James Madison's term, was more ham-fisted than the first. In this war, U.S.
Explanation:
Answer:
Judicial activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is a situation whereby Judges may interpret the Constitution to their taste, adapting it to modern situations: award rights, make other branches take action, Prescribing rather than proscribe.it is based on the philosophy of judicial decision-making as judges allow, mainly, their personal views about public policy to guide and help in their decisions making or taking. In it, the flexibility of the Constitution is inadequate.
In this philosophy, Court can go beyond the words of the Constitution e.g judge can use his own personal intuition or views or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.