1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
devlian [24]
3 years ago
10

As a bystander, which approach may not work when the person you’re trying to stop is likely to become defensive or hostile?

Social Studies
1 answer:
8_murik_8 [283]3 years ago
3 0

As a bystander, using the Direct approach might not work if the person becomes defensive.

There are several approaches to dealing with conflict as a bystander such as:

  • being direct and telling the person who is in the wrong that they are in the wrong
  • distracting the parties involved by suggesting an alternative activity
  • delegating the issue to someone who the parties in conflict trust such as a friend or authority figure

When being direct, it is best that it is only done when you know the person enough that they will not take offence at your action because they could get defensive or hostile if not.

In conclusion, use the other approaches described when a person is being hostile as opposed to being direct.

<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/12159116.</em>

You might be interested in
What was the most important item that traveled the silk road from asia to europe and africa?
kodGreya [7K]
Spices and clothng,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
8 0
3 years ago
Which relationship best illustrates a comparison of absolute advantage and comparative advantage?
nikitadnepr [17]
The best way to illustrate the relationship of the comparison is a country using a comparative advantage can create a merchandise at a smaller opportunity cost, even though a different country has an absolute advantage in the manufacture of all those goods.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the impact of the Amritsar Massacre?
Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

A

Many Indians joined the British military to fight in World War I.

Explanation:

The Amritsar massacre fundamentally changed how the Indians saw the Raj (the era of British rule, which ran from 1757 to 1947). It led Mahatma Gandhi, who during the first world war had forsaken his pacifism to help recruit soldiers to preserve the empire, to see British rule as satanic.

5 0
3 years ago
In order to reduce poverty, some governments in Latin America have
Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

A : Natural Resources Hope This Helps!!

5 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer.
guapka [62]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • All vehicles must have two red lights visible from a distance of not less than ______ feet to the rear.
    5·2 answers
  • Winning the approval of someone else is a good reason to change a behavior.
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is most closely tied to overcrowding?
    14·1 answer
  • “Indus valley civilization paved way for modern civilizations”- Substantiate the statement with three points *
    5·1 answer
  • According to expectancy theory, your ______ is low if you don't think a bonus or raise is going to be big enough to justify work
    6·1 answer
  • What does it mean when a state adopts a textbook?
    14·1 answer
  • In 100 words, create a speech for "Jimmy Carter for president." Identify promises he would have made to America.
    12·1 answer
  • What do you think is the greatest advantage of the scientific revolution? why?
    13·2 answers
  • What are some actions that an unlimited government might take to maintain its authority to lead a nation?
    6·2 answers
  • A very detailed description of project requirements would appeal most to a ____________.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!