Answer:
Of the options provided, the characteristic that applies to Max Weber's ideal type of bureaucracy is Option D. A set of rules govern the conduct of officials at all levels of the organization.
Explanation:
Weber described many ideal types of public administration and governance in his book called Economy and Society, published in 1922. He noted that traditional, charismatic, and rational-legal or bureaucratic were the three kinds of power in organizations. For Weber, in the bureaucratic system legitimacy is believed to come from a legal order. There are six dimensions to the nature of the bureaucratic organization for Weber: Administrative class, hierarchy, division of work, official rules, impersonal relationships, and official record. The advantages of bureaucracy are consistency in employee behavior because employees are certain of the rules and their duties and responsibilities are clearly defined. The management process is easier as a result. But in terms of disadvantages, the rules in a bureaucracy can make it hard to innovate or to change behaviors and strict adherence to rules can lead to inefficiencies over time if there are a lot of reporting requirements or red tape, for instance.
One of the example would be: <span>Asking women if they have had an abortion
Women who had abortion usually experienced a drastic emotional pressure right before and after the abortion process.
Finding out the harm of abortion by collecting the data from women who never actually experienced wouldn't represent the closest situation compared to the women who actually experienced it.</span>
The Manhattan Project was the code name for the American-led effort to develop a functional atomic weapon during World War II. The controversial creation and eventual use of the atomic bomb engaged some of the world’s leading scientific minds, as well as the U.S. military—and most of the work was done in Los Alamos, New Mexico, not the borough of New York City for which it was originally named
Answer:
The argument seems logical but...
Explanation:
In population there is not much difference between New Jersey (9 million) and Georgia (10 million) but I guess in average income there is, and quite a big one too.
We also have to take into account that a state that legalizes sports betting will attract many people in the beginning (because of the novelty) and, more to the point, that probably a lot of these people making sports bets are not residents of New Jersey.
A more ethical argument would be to prove that legalizing sports bets is indeed an effective way to stop the ilegal sports betting.