In Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the Supreme Court had to decide whether "due process of law" means states must obey the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The observation of the Supreme Court is that the convict cannot be punished two times for the same offense. It is simple and very clear that the convict cannot be punished under the fourth and fifth amendments for same offense.
In this particular case, the prosecution has charged Frank Palko for first-degree murder and the court has given a decree as life imprisonment. But the actual nature crime amounts to second-degree murder.
So, the state of Connecticut appealed against this judgment and it has been proved that offense made by Frank Palko amounts to second-degree murder and the death penalty is awarded to convict. The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko vs Connecticut was Palko was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy.
Answer:
Your answer would be B; "they signed the contract with the first dealer and now must take the original deal."
Explanation:
They already signed the contract with the first dealer and now the only option available to them is to take the original deal since they have already signed the contract meaning they have legal duty to that first dealer. (Legal Duty: a legally binding obligation on a contract to follow the law when doing something towards the other part. Since they have signed it is legally binding that they now take the original deal or the first deal.)
