1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zaharov [31]
2 years ago
11

Razia was appointed the sultan because she was more able and qualified than all her brothers. Yet she was dethroned after 4 year

s because her rule went against the 'ideal social order' created by god. DO you think this gender distinction was justified?
Should men and women be considered equal? Give your opinion
Social Studies
2 answers:
Alina [70]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I think men and women should be treated equal. Im a female myself and it wouldnt be very fun if i couldnt go to school or hold a job. I would have to be at home cleaning and cooking all day!

Lorico [155]2 years ago
3 0

Gender-equality will help make a society wealthier, improve freedom, strengthen families, improve democracy, promote peace, reduce violence and increase the odds of satisfying orgasms.

Settle down and I’ll tell you more about it.

Filling roles with the person who is best qualified rather than the person who is best qualified and the “right” gender means on the average getting better qualified people. Relative to a strictly gender-segregated society a gender-equal one has twice the talent-pool available for all jobs.

Gender-equality increases freedom since it gives individuals the freedom to do anything they want to do, rather than limit them arbitrarily to a subset of activities judged “appropriate” for their gender.

Gender-equality increases the resilience and flexibility of families. In a family with strict gender-roles odds are only the husband has a income, and only the wife has experience and expertise in handling household-chores. A gender-equal family in contrast frequently has 2 adults who both have a income and are both able to take competently care of the household. This makes them a lot better equipped to handle life’s curve-balls.

Gender-equality strengthens democracy. The entire point of Democracy is that the people hold the ultimate power in a society. It should be fairly obvious why excluding half of humanity from equal participation in running society by necessity weakens democracy, relative to letting all genders contribute equally.

Gender-equality promotes peace and reduces violence: “research has found robust support for a relationship between gender inequality and civil war. These results all point in the same direction; countries that display lower levels of gender equality are more likely to become involved in civil conflict, and violence is likely to be even more severe, than in countries where women have a higher status.” (note that this remains true even after compensating for GDP/capita)

Better gender-equality gives (heterosexual) women more, and better, orgasms.[1] This might not, strictly speaking, be hugely important to social organization (except perhaps by increasing women’s average happiness), but I wanted to mention it anyway, because really gender-equality is one of those things that are win-win-win all around for everyone.

The list of benefits of better gender-equality is much longer than this, I feel as if I could comfortably write an entire novel about the numerous benefits, large and small, of better gender-equality.

I could talk about improvements in the lives of homosexual people, about fathers who knows their children, about mothers with a career, about saving money, about being a teenager in a more gender-equal society, about civil rights, about reduction of crime, about lower child-poverty, about better mental health, about tolerance and acceptance, about a endless list of things.

But I think the above is enough.

I’d like to add though that most of the list above is true for ALL types of equality, not just gender-equality. We should not be so hung up on gender that we forget about or ignore other axes of discrimination such as race, religion, or disability

You might be interested in
Pleasr can you help me to mention the fundamental passion according to Christianity​
just olya [345]

Answer: Passion of Jesus

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What was Martin Luther’s response to the church selling indulgences to build a cathedral?
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

 Martin Luther thought that this was horrible. He did not believe that you can buy your way to Heaven, or buy your way out of hell to heaven. He wrote 95 reasons (Ninety Five-Theses) on why buying indulgences is wrong. Basically, an indulgence is like a note that shows however many sins you done, you can buy your way out of going to hell and go to Heaven. The reasons tried to prove why they were wrong. He also posted on a church door in Wittenberg, Germany.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
Please say fast as you can...
IceJOKER [234]
Correct answer to your choice is C
6 0
3 years ago
The theorist who believed that children learn language when they are reinforced by parental attention was?
defon

The theorist who believed that children learn language when they are reinforced by parental attention was B.F.Skinner.

B.F.Skinner was a celebrated American psychologist who advanced the behaviorist theory of learning. This theory is based on the idea that learning occurs through a method of ‘conditioning’, which when stimulus, rewards, and punishments are combined to drive the learning process.

The conditioning relies on what Skinner calls reinforcement. Reinforcement is of two types, namely positive reinforcers, which are the rewards after meeting a target, and negative reinforcers, which refers to the unpleasant consequences of failing to meet the target.

Actions that are followed by negative reinforcers tend to weaken, while those followed by positive reinforcers tend to be repeated. For example, children can be encouraged to learn language if they receive consistent positive reinforcement from their parents every time they learn a new word or phrase.

To learn more about B.F. Skinner : brainly.com/question/10580861

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Can someone rephrase this Paragraph?? (I need this done tonight)
Marianna [84]

Answer:

the paragraph is about Tommas Jefferson so maybe talk about freedom and the decoration of independent

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Dani wants to measure the volume of a pebble. Which tool will give the most accurate measurement
    7·2 answers
  • Viv's father demands total obedience from his children. When he speaks, he expects his children to listen. There is no discussio
    10·1 answer
  • Why are politicians more likely to focus their political actions on individuals with higher incomes and higher levels of educati
    9·1 answer
  • What was the original name of israel <br>1. Canaan <br>2. Jericho <br>3. palestine <br>4. acre ​
    14·2 answers
  • Why did the Roman Empire fall?
    11·1 answer
  • According to Islamic belief, how did Muhammad get the ideas that started Islam?​
    8·1 answer
  • 2. What are two changes made to Texas's constitution while Texas was part of the Confederacy?
    10·1 answer
  • Choose true or false then explain why <br><br> Anyone can help with good heart
    14·1 answer
  • Bakit mahalagang mabatid ng mga mamamayan ang kanilang pagiging vulnerable sa mga disaster?
    11·2 answers
  • in person-centered therapy, this nonjudgmental acceptance of all feelings the patient expresses is known as
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!