Answer:
<em>If you are using Brainly on your iPhone or another iOS device, you have to cancel your subscription on the App Store. </em>
<em>If you are using Brainly on your iPhone or another iOS device, you have to cancel your subscription on the App Store. Here are the steps:</em>
<em>1</em><em>.</em><em>Access the Settings app</em>
<em>2</em><em>.</em><em>Tap your name</em>
<em>3</em><em>.</em><em>Scroll down until you reach the Subscriptions feature</em>
<em>4</em><em>.</em><em>Tap on Subscriptions</em>
<em>5</em><em>.</em><em>Locate your Brainly Plus subscription</em>
<em>6</em><em>.</em><em>Select Cancel Subscription</em>
Answer:
<h2>The right to property, or the right to own property (cf. ownership) is often classified as a human right for natural persons regarding their possessions. A general recognition of a right to private property is found more rarely and is typically heavily constrained insofar as property is owned by legal persons (i.e. corporations) and where it is used for production rather than consumption.[1]</h2><h2 /><h2>A right to property is recognised in Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,[2] but it is not recognised in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights or the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.[3] The European Convention on Human Rights, in Protocol 1, article 1, acknowledges a right for natural and legal persons to "peaceful enjoyment of his possessions", subject to the "general interest or to secure the payment of taxes."</h2><h2 /><h2>Definition </h2><h2>Relationship to other rights </h2><h2>History </h2><h2>See also </h2><h2>Notes </h2><h2>References </h2>
<h2>External links</h2>
I would do B but i don’t know
Under Article V of the Constitution, there are two ways to propose and ratify amendments to the Constitution. To propose amendments, two-thirds of both houses of Congress can vote to propose an amendment, or two-thirds of the state legislatures can ask Congress to call a national convention to propose amendments.
Hope this helps!
Please give brainliest!
Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.
<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>
This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.
Read more about contract here:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
