1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liberstina [14]
4 years ago
10

A German plaintiff had sold equipment to an American firm on open account. On the date the amounts were due, the American firm o

wed the plaintiff 60,000 Euros. At that time, the dollar was worth 2.5 Euros. Three years later, the plaintiff took a judgment against the American firm in the courts of New York. At the time of judgment, the dollar was worth only 1.5 Euros. The New York court may do which of the following:_______
a. Award judgment to the plaintiff in $24,000 of U.S. currency.
b. Award judgment to the plaintiff in $40,000 of U.S. currency.
c. Award judgment to the plaintiff in 60,000 D.M., German currency.
d. Dismiss the case. U.S. courts cannot hear cases involving foreign currencies.
Law
1 answer:
CaHeK987 [17]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:b got it correct on a test

Explanation:

You might be interested in
I just need help getting a head start with this and getting an idea on where to go with it.
Aleksandr [31]

i would answer, but it seems like you appreciated it more if i walked you through it

Actus reus: commonly defined as a criminal act that was the result of voluntary bodily movement. This describes a physical activity that harms another person or damages property. Anything from a physical assault or murder to the destruction of public property would qualify as an actus reus.

Mens rea: the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused.

answer

statutory r*pe can still be valid, even only with actus rea. if the defendant was unaware of the fact that the victim was a minor, it would still be punishable by a maximum of fifteen years' criminal imprisonment.

edit:

your response must be 300 words in length and cited in APA format

Statutory r*pe can still be valid, even only with actus rea. If the defendant was unaware of the fact that the victim was a minor, it would still be punishable by a maximum of fifteen years' criminal imprisonment. Regardless of mens rea, your defendant can still be charged with a federal offense.

By definition, actus reus is commonly defined as a criminal act that was the result of voluntary bodily movement. This describes a physical activity that harms another person or damages property. Anything from a physical assault or murder to the destruction of public property would qualify as an actus reus.

Mens rea is the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused.

I agree with this law, it not only further protects victims but also (insert opinion). Mens rea was intentionally made as a non-deciding factor, because there is no statistical way to prove this. While it is necessary to prove guilt in a criminal trial, prosecution typically must prove beyond doubt that the defendant committed the offense with a culpable state of mind.

Citation: crimemuseum.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Sep. 2020.

<https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/criminal-law/actus-reus>.

Retrieved from https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/criminal-law/actus-reus

crimemuseum.org. https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/criminal-law/actus-reus (accessed September 11, 2020).

ps its not all 300 words

8 0
3 years ago
How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0
3 years ago
How did george mason feel about a powerful federal government?
OLga [1]

Answer:

who is George mason

Explanation:

plz tell me

7 0
3 years ago
What can the study of crime tell us about our society more generally?
drek231 [11]

Answer: Yes

Explanation:

Because with the crime it can give us a statics and that will how us how society is. But only using statics.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
19. The Smith System is
Bumek [7]
The correct answer is A
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are some of the weaknesses in bureaucracies?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about prison research is true?
    11·1 answer
  • The core constitutional principle defining the role of the legislature and the
    14·1 answer
  • FIRST AMENDMENT STUDENT CASES:
    13·1 answer
  • Samathahas a small business selling clothes. Because his shop is too small to store all his goods so he must hire a a warehouse.
    11·1 answer
  • Why is it that any law which contradicts natural law is unjust?
    5·1 answer
  • Eighty percent (80%) of all accident happen within
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following illustrates the president’s role as chief of state?
    15·1 answer
  • The use of turn signals as a signal to the driver of other vehicles that it is safe to pass is:
    8·1 answer
  • Why is buying a unified system of ssn is very useful in the us
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!