Answer:
A) Recruiting at community events near or on Native American reservations and from colleges located nearby
Explanation:
The approach that will yield maximum result if adopted will be for the UCA to carryout their recruitment at community events near or on Native American reservations and from colleges located nearby, by adopting this practice, more Native Americans will be reached for employment opportunities and thus giving them an edge/added chance of being employed, considering that Native Americans are relatively communal. For example, if recruitment is carried out at community events on Native American reservations, the population of Native Americans applying will be higher than any other ethnicity and thus the percentage of qualified Native Americans for the jobs compared to other ethnic groups will still be higher leading to an increase in the numbers employed.
Rating all applicants on a 100 point scale and giving the Native Americans an added 20 point will infringe on fair labour practices and besides Native Americans population are relatively communal.
Option C and D will equally infringe on fair labour practices
Hi! They might look for the help of a forensic chemist because they study chemistry so they would be able to tell you about the toxic substance and what it can do along with the side effects. A forensic geneticist studies genes, a forensic sociologist studies human behavior, and a forensic etymologist studies origin and history of words. So the most helpful one would be the forensic chemist. i hope this helps, Goodluck :)
Explanation:
comparison microscopes are used to identify a specific weapon.
every gun weapon, has a unique pattern on the bullet after firing.
authorities can compare a murder weapon with the same stock of gun.
if murder weapon is found, they can compare the "murder bullet" with existing guns of the same make, model, if while finding the murder weapon, the same pattern exists on suspected weapon's bullet, it will be subjected as evidence.
Answer:
Federal District Court
Explanation:
The first case would likely start in the Federal District Court and could be appealed to the State Supreme Court and United States Supreme Court. As seen in <em>Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. </em>the school district which suspended a girl for vulgar speech off school grounds started their case in the federal court of Middle District of Pennsylvania and eventually appealed all the way to the Supreme Court.
Edit: <em>Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. </em>did not appeal to the State Supreme Court likely because the First Amendment is a federal law and not state law.
Answer:
BEcasue she foudn the music sheet at lincolns house
Explanation:
