Answer:
a. intragenerational
Explanation:
Intragenerational mobility by definition: refers to a person's social movements throughout his or her lifespan. It wouldn't be structural or life cycle because those are remotely related to social mobility. Lastly it wouldn't be intergenerational because by definition is means: elating to, involving, or affecting several generations. Which is not related to social mobility at all.
Answer:
Electron microscopes differ from light microscopes in that they produce an image of a specimen by using a beam of electrons rather than a beam of light. Electrons have much a shorter wavelength than visible light, and this allows electron microscopes to produce higher-resolution images than standard light microscope
Hope it is helpful !!!
Answer:
with a record of 98% in 1895. The evolutionary importance of the moth was only speculated upon during Darwin's lifetime. ... This selective survival was due to birds which easily caught dark moths on clean trees, and white moths on trees darkened with soot.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
It would not be D because D is the location of a common ancestor, AKA an animal that does not haver jaws or bones. It would not be C because the question states that the fish has jaws, and C does not have jaws since the arrow does not point to that. It would not be A because the question states the fish has "NO TRUE BONES", meaning that there are no bones present. And in A, there is the bones arrow pointing to it, meaning that A has bones since that trait is on the same horizontal line as A. Only leaving us with option B left, since it came from an ancestor with jaws but not from an ancestor with bones. Sorry, I'm not the best with explaining but hopefully that makes sense why it is B, it's like a family tree, you just have to follow it carefully :) I hope that helps
