The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the first choice , a. restrictive.
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
Answer:
The correct answer will be- No.
Explanation:
The research is called scientific research if it follows the scientific method that is making observations, asking questions, proposing hypothesis which could be tested through the expedients.
In the given questions, since the scientist tried to study the effect of the stars in the personalty for which he continuously recorded the results for four years. The co-relation of the stars to the type of personality depends on the belief system but it lacks any evidence to support the case. So, this will be the case of the pseudo-science.
Thus, No will be the correct answer.
Answer:
Check below, please.
Explanation:
5.
The scale of points produced by Gottman Group has shown two types of couple: High Risk and Low Risk of Divorce.
But the key factor was their interaction on the conversation.
This has shown us that Low risk of Divorce Couples score much more negative points than the High risk ones. And then the "low risk" got into a spiral of negativity so faster then the High risk.
6. The negativity threshold is how bad a Husband and Wife reacts to each other in theirs conversation. If there is a sequence of arguing, bad reactions then a negativity threshold is formed.
7. Similarly to a couple's relationship which is based on how a husband and wife reacts to each other while they're having a conversation, so the same as displayed in the equation
Is the way to countries at war behave.
8. To my surprise, I didn't know there was an equation by Mr. James Murray to explain a pattern of behavior of couples.
Answer:
The answer is D. a placebo effect.
Explanation:
Placebos can be described as "fake" medication or treatment which intends to appear as real. Hence, the placebo effect occurs when a person affirms that he was a affected in any particular way, while there was no reason for that to happen.
For example: a person is asked to take a cup of "very high-caffeine coffee" and describe his symtpoms. The person then states that he feels very alarmed, and that his heart is racing. If at the end it's revealed that it was actually <u>decaf</u> coffee, it's likely the person was under the placebo effect.
