The Reconstruction era is always a challenge to teach. First, it was a period of tremendous political complexity and far-reaching consequences. A cursory survey of Reconstruction is never satisfying, but a fuller treatment of Reconstruction can be like quick sand—easy to get into but impossible to get out of. Second, to the extent that students may have any preconceptions about Reconstruction, they are often an obstacle to a deeper understanding of the period. Given these challenges, I have gradually settled on an approach to the period that avoids much of the complex chronology of the era and instead focuses on the “big questions” of Reconstruction.
However important a command of the chronology of Reconstruction may be, it is equally important that students understand that Reconstruction was a period when American waged a sustained debate over who was an American, what rights should all Americans enjoy, and what rights would only some Americans possess. In short, Americans engaged in a strenuous debate about the nature of freedom and equality.
With the surrender of Confederate armies and the capture of Jefferson Davis in the spring of 1865, pressing questions demanded immediate answers.
Answer:
the last one D they worship more than one god
Explanation:
if you look into your glossary, you can see that's what it means
Answer:
False because creativity helps economy growth.
Explanation:
Hope This Helps
Have A Great Day
<span>One of the major advantages of judges being appointed is that they are usually chosen on their basis of how well they have done their jobs, are they fair, have they done exceptional work in deciding their cases judgements. One of the disadvantages is that sometimes bad judges can slip thru the cracks when appointed that may not have the right moral compass to judge cases fairly. As such some judges can also be swayed to look the otherway on issues that they strongly oppose that their constituents may favor.</span>
