Answer:
those employed solely in agriculture
The answer would be Consumer choices.
Answer:
This page in a nutshell: Summarize in your own words instead of closely paraphrasing. Closely paraphrased material that infringes on the copyright of its source material should be rewritten or deleted to avoid infringement, and to ensure that it complies with Wikipedia policy. Public domain sources and CC-BY-SA-compatible sources may be closely paraphrased, and limited close paraphrasing of copyrighted sources may also be permitted as fair use. Attribution is always required.
For information on copy and pasting text, see Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources.
Close paraphrasing is the superficial modification of material from another source. Editors should generally summarize source material in their own words, adding inline citations as required by the sourcing policy.
Limited close paraphrasing is appropriate within reason, as is quoting, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text – for example, by adding "John Smith wrote ...", together with a footnote containing the citation at the end of the clause, sentence or paragraph. Limited close paraphrasing is also appropriate if there are only a limited number of ways to say the same thing.
Close paraphrasing without in-text attribution may constitute plagiarism, and when extensive (with or without in-text attribution) may also violate Wikipedia's copyright policy, which forbids Wikipedia contributors from copying an excessive amount of material directly from other sources. Public domain material must likewise be attributed to avoid plagiarism. If the source material bears a free copyright license that is compatible with Wikipedia's licenses, copying or closely paraphrasing it is not a copyright violation so long as the source is attributed somewhere in the article, usually at the end.
The best way to prevent close paraphrasing is to understand clearly when it is a problem, how to avoid it, and how to address it when it appears.
Answer:
"Christopher Columbus has caused significant money and success instead to Spain" is the correct approach.
Explanation:
- Probably eventually, Columbus itself was required to leave to Spain with more than just chewing tobacco, turkey together as well as some innovative flavorings.
- He further managed to bring with him certain indigenous people including its islands, some of who Queen Isabella was always very enamored of. Columbus has made three other similar trips to this region.
So the above response is the appropriate one.
Answer:
<em>The probability that more than 3.75 gallons are used for any wash cycle is 0.8944 or 89.44%</em>
Explanation:
<u>Normal Distribution</u>
Some probabilistic events are modeled by using the so-called bell curve or normal distribution 
where 
is the mean and 
is the standar deviation. The cummulative values for the normal distribution are usually given as 'left tail' of the sum of all values less than certain maximum value. In other words, the value of 
is given by tables or any digital means because the cannot be directly computed by formulas. We used the Excel's formula called NORM.DIST(x,mean,standard_dev,cumulative).
The study case of the question provides the following data
And we are required to compute 
. Since the Excel formula gives us the left-tail value, we use the negation of that value to find our desired probability, that is:
We now find the value of NORM.DIST(3.75,4,0.2,TRUE)=0.1056. Thus
Thus the probability that more than 3.75 gallons are used for any wash cycle is 0.8944 or 89.44%
