Whats this method called? How do you use this strategy for other questions?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Ivan3 years ago

5 0

Answer with Step-by-step explanation:

The method uses the formula of the right angles triangle, more precisely the pythogorean formula,

In step 2, it is the power law of indices,

Other than this, other tricks used here is the using of square root on step no 6.

You can take the square root ,cube root, square, etc in equations but you have to do it on both sides, you can even add r subtract numbers and do all sorts of things.

it is the process of solving equations by equality.

Eg:

x=5

x^2=5^2

√x=√x

x-7=5-7

8/2x=8/2*5, etc

You might be interested in

I put a picture of the question. please help <3

Charra [1.4K]

Answer: 904.78

Explanation:

V=4

3πr3=4

3·π·63≈904.77868

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A line whose slope is 4 and passes through the point (0, -9) lies on the line whose equation is:

Svet_ta [14]

You should use point-slope form: y-y1 = m(x-x1)

y+9 = 4(x)
y-4x=-9
4x-y=9 (B)

6 0

3 years ago

Prove the segments joining the midpoint of consecutive sides of an isosceles trapezoid form a rhombus. use the distance formula

riadik2000 [5.3K]

In order to prove this, we have to put the trapezoid to the coordinate system. In the attached photo you can see how it has to be put. The coordinates for the vertices of trapezoid written according to the midpoint principle. By using the distance between two points formula, we can find the coordinates for the vertices of the rhombus.
$D_{x} = \frac{-2b-2a}{2}=-b-a$ and $D_{y}= \frac{2c+0}{2}=c$ . The coordinates of D is $(-b-a, c)$
$E_{x} = \frac{-2b+2b}{2}=0$ and $E_{y}= \frac{2c+2c}{2}=2c$ . The coordinates of E is $(0,2c)$
Since we have the reflection in this graph, the coordinates of F is $(b+a, c)$
And the coordinates of G is (0,0).

Using the distance formula, we can find that
$DE= \sqrt{(-b-a)^{2}+ c^{2}}=\sqrt{(b+a)^{2} + c^{2}}$
$EF= \sqrt{(b+a)^{2} + c^{2} }$
$GF= \sqrt{(b+a )^{2} + c^{2} }$
$DG= \sqrt{(b+a)^{2}+ c^{2}$

Since all the sides are equal this completes our proof. Additionally, we can find the distances of EG and DF in order to show that the diagonals of this rhombus are not equal. So that it is not a square, but rhombus.