Answer:
c. 2n-6
Step-by-step explanation:
6 less than 2xSteve so 2n-6
Answer:
B) The sum of the squared residuals
Step-by-step explanation:
Least Square Regression Line is drawn through a bivariate data(Data in two variables) plotted on a graph to explain the relation between the explanatory variable(x) and the response variable(y).
Not all the points will lie on the Least Square Regression Line in all cases. Some points will be above line and some points will be below the line. The vertical distance between the points and the line is known as residual. Since, some points are above the line and some are below, the sum of residuals is always zero for a Least Square Regression Line.
Since, we want to minimize the overall error(residual) so that our line is as close to the points as possible, considering the sum of residuals wont be helpful as it will always be zero. So we square the residuals first and them sum them. This always gives a positive value. The Least Square Regression Line minimizes this sum of residuals and the result is a line of Best Fit for the bivariate data.
Therefore, option B gives the correct answer.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation: subtract 160 and 125 and you’ll get 35
Answer:
They are both similar in the way that the formula is base multiplied by height. They are different because of the type of shape on the base.
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps
Well, 10 can go into 56, 5 times, so your whole number would be 5.
Then 50 (where did i get 50 from? 5 times the ten is 50) minues 56 is 6. So it would be :
5 and 6/10 (your denominator stays the same)
But it needs o be simplafied to its lowest terms. They are both divisable by 2, SOO 6 divided by 2 is 3, and 10 divided by 2 is 5 So, your new fraction is:
5 and 3/5 in which it cant be simplafied anymore.
<em>~ 5 3/5 </em><em>is your answer :)</em>
