Answer:
to change the Nepalese society because how urban is poor in Nepal
Under the principle of indirect rule, <u>native culture </u><u>was </u><u>accepted </u><u>to come degree. </u>
<h3>What was indirect rule?</h3>
- The colonial government would be in charge of the whole colony.
- The colonial government would govern the colony through the use of traditional governing institutions.
As a result, the people still had a lot of freedom to engage in their traditions because their immediate government was born from those same traditions.
In conclusion, option A is correct.
Find out more about indirect rule at brainly.com/question/2032130.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Mental compulsion.
Explanation:
Tony hates his brother so much that he has started to think that if anything bad happens to his brother, he would be the one responsible for that. So whenever he passes by his brother's room, he starts to count odd numbers, this helps him lessen his anxiety. Tony's this behavior describes as the Mental compulsion.
Compulsions are behaviors that are repeated again and again to reduce the anxiety that is related to some obsession, and obsessions are unreasonable, unrelated thoughts or fears that make a person anxious. So to reduce the obsessions, a person may act compulsive. He tries to find out ways to reduce his anxiety, just like in the given question, Tony starts to count odd number whenever he passes by his brother room to reduce his fears and unreasonable thoughts.
Answer:
YES
Explanation:
Because “At no previous time has American security been as seriously threatened from without as it is today,” Roosevelt admitted, but he still had hope for a future that would encompass the “four essential human freedoms”—including freedom from fear. And when Pearl Harbor was attacked at the end of that year, news reports from the time showed that Americans indeed responded with determination more than fear.
Nearly three quarters of a century later, a poll released in December found that Americans are more fearful of terrorism than at any point since Sept. 11, 2001. And while recent events like the attacks in ISIS-inspired attacks in Paris and the fatal shootings in San Bernardino, Calif. may have Americans particularly on edge, experts say that Roosevelt’s advice has gone unheeded for sometime. “My research starts in the 1980s and goes more or less till now, and there have been very high fear levels in the U.S. continuously,” says Barry Glassner, president of Lewis & Clark college and author of The Culture of Fear: Why Americans Are Afraid of the Wrong Things.
Firm data on fear levels only go back so far, so it’s hard to isolate a turning point. Gallup polls on fear of terrorism only date to about the time of the Oklahoma City Bombing in 1995. (At that point, 42% of respondents were very or somewhat worried about terrorism; the post-9/11 high mark for that question is 59% in October of 2001, eight percentage points above last month’s number.) Other questionnaires about fear of terrorism date back to the early 1980s, following the rise of global awareness of terrorism in the previous decade, as Carl Brown of Cornell University’s Roper Center public opinion archives points out. Academics who study fear use materials like letters and newspaper articles to fill in the gaps, and those documents can provide valuable clues.
