Answer:
Culrural relativism
Explanation:
This idea was first originated in the anthropological research by Franz Boas in the first few decades of the 20th century and later popularized by his students.
It suggests that a person's behaviour cannot rightly be evaluated by a culture outside of his own. In other words, to understand ones behaviour, it should be analyzed paying attention to his culture.
A theodicy for some given fact about evil is an explanation for why God would have an all‐things‐considered sufficient reason to allow that evil. The counterpart theodicy relies on a metaphysical claim about existence. We cannot know what "good" is unless there is "evil" to contrast it with. (1) Doesn't justify all kinds of evil (Do we need genocide to know what goodness is?), (2) Doesn't justify the amount of evil (Do we need so much killing/theft to know what goodness is?), (3) God can know good/evil prior to creation/evil.
Answer:
of what leader is there more to the question?/
Explanation:
<span>Protestant Ethic.
Max Weber held that the Protestant ethic was an essential factor in the monetary accomplishment of Protestant gatherings in the beginning periods of European private enterprise; on the grounds that common achievement could be deciphered as an indication of everlasting salvation, it was vivaciously sought after</span><span />
