1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stellarik [79]
3 years ago
13

Melchizedek and the king of Sodom presented a marked contrast as they both descended into the king's dale in Genesis 14:17-18. M

elchizedek was a mature believer; he was a king and a priest. He went down to give Abram communion and to help Abram keep his eyes firmly fixed on the Most High God, the possessor of heaven and earth, the source of his blessings. The king of Sodom, on the other hand, was no longer a king. His kingdom had been taken from him by force. As a man, he was clever and evil. He went down to ambush Abram, to rob him of the joy of God's grace and deliverance, to tempt him with the loot he had brought back. He ordered Abram to give him the people, for whom Abram could have demanded a ransom. He offered to let Abram keep the plunder, which would have made Abram the richest man in the world. His aim was to get Abram's eyes off the source and onto the possessions.
main idea:
English
1 answer:
denpristay [2]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:Melchizedek and the king of Sodom presented a marked contrast as they both descended into the king's dale in Genesis 14:17-18. Melchizedek was a mature believer; he was a king and a priest. He went down to give Abram communion and to help Abram keep his eyes firmly fixed on the Most High God, the possessor of heaven and earth, the source of his blessings. The king of Sodom, on the other hand, was no longer a king. His kingdom had been taken from him by force. As a man, he was clever and evil. He went down to ambush Abram, to rob him of the joy of God's grace and deliverance, to tempt him with the loot he had brought back. He ordered Abram to give him the people, for whom Abram could have demanded a ransom. He offered to let Abram keep the plunder, which would have made Abram the richest man in the world. His aim was to get Abram's eyes off the source and onto the possessions.

main idea:ing. His kingdom had been taken from him by force. As a man, he was clever and evil. He went down to ambush Abram, to rob him of the joy of God's grace and deliverance, to tempt him with the loot he had brought back. He ordered Abram to give him the people, for whom Abram could have demanded a ransom.

Explanation:He ordered Abram to give him the people, for whom Abram could have demanded a ransom. He offered to let Abram keep the plunder, which would have made Abram the richest man in the world.

You might be interested in
What Can Michael do to figure out what makes the merry-go-round easiest to push?
masya89 [10]
He would have to push on it creating a torque that causes angular velocity of the merry go round to change.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which in-text citation is formatted correctly in MLA style?
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

the first one: "...by" (38).

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the golden casket represent from shakes spare merchant of venice<br> asap answer please
Tanya [424]

I have formed a brief explanation of what your answer should consist of.

Answer: The casket might remind us of the 'three chests of gold, silver, and lead' in The Merchant of Venice, which form part of the 'lott'ry' devised by Portia's father before his death, to dictate whom she should marry

Explanation: have a great day! <3

7 0
3 years ago
One Sunday night, business was painfully slow at Gibbons, the restaurant where I worked. An hour had passed since I had waited o
Schach [20]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
What is the effect of Thoreau’s syntactical choices in this passage? (Be sure to answer the implied component of this question—w
vova2212 [387]

Thoreau uses several subordinate sentences, preventing the reader from stopping reading and having to finish a paragraph to have a complete understanding.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • Subordinate sentences are sentences that do not have full meaning.
  • These sentences need a complement to get a message across to the reader.
  • In this case, these sentences reinforce the need to complete the reading, as the paragraph has to be read completely to be understood.

This is directly connected with Thoreau's intention in the text because by using subordinate sentences, he reinforces the idea that the reader has to finish the paragraph to understand the relationship he is establishing between ants and human beings.

More information:

brainly.com/question/22930667?referrer=searchResults

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these lines contains imagery that appeals to touch?
    15·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE YOU WILL GET BRAINLIEST
    15·2 answers
  • Which identifies the compound sentence that is not correctly punctuated?
    7·2 answers
  • Title: The Apollo 13 Mission
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following shows correct parallel structure?
    5·1 answer
  • Why are three-dimensional models useful for understanding the lunar phases?
    5·1 answer
  • Both “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and “Ballad of Birmingham” give readers a picture of the civil rights movement and its cause,
    8·1 answer
  • HELP ASAPPPPP!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Read the passage from “Initiation.”
    8·1 answer
  • What is a teachers biggest pet pieve
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!