1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
guajiro [1.7K]
3 years ago
6

(Will give 25 points) Given the graph of this trigonometic funaction over which domain(s) could inverse function be constructed

Mathematics
1 answer:
GREYUIT [131]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

ok so i think it it a or b i don't know but hope i am right

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
The total cost (in dollars) of producing x food processors is C(x) = 2500 + 50x -0.28.
Darya [45]

Answer:

The exact cost of producing the 21st food processor is $38.52.

The marginal cost to approximate the cost of producing the 21st food processor is $38.24

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider the provided function.

C(x) = 2500 + 50x -0.28x^2

(A) Find the exact cost of producing the 21st food processor

The exact cost producing 21st food processor is C(21)-C(20)

Substitute x=21 in above function.

C(x) = 2500 + 50(21) -0.28(21)^2

C(x) = 2500 +1050 -123.48

C(x) = 3426.52

Substitute x=20 in above function.

C(x) = 2500 + 50(20) -0.28(20)^2

C(x) = 2500 +1000-112

C(x) = 3388

The exact cost producing is:

C(21)-C(20)=3426.52-3388=38.52

Hence, the exact cost of producing the 21st food processor is $38.52.

Part (B) Use the marginal cost to approximate the cost of producing the 21st food processor,

To find the marginal cost first differentiate the function with respect to x.

C(x) = 2500 + 50x -0.28x^2

C'(x) =50-0.56x

Now substitute x=21 in above function.

C'(x) =50-0.56(21)

C'(x) =50-11.76

C'(x) =38.24

The marginal cost to approximate the cost of producing the 21st food processor is $38.24

5 0
3 years ago
.84 is 10 times as much as
madreJ [45]
0.84 is 10 times as much as 0.084
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP I WILL MARK YOU AS A BRAINLIEST I KNOW IM SO DUMB!!
monitta

Answer:

6.15.

Step-by-step explanation:

3.75 + 2 2/5

= 3.75 + 2.40

= 6.15.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Helpppppppppppppp
Genrish500 [490]

Answer: Vertical angles are congruent.



Step-by-step explanation:

In the given picture, NS and RT are intersecting line segments, intersects at point Q.

We know that when two lines intersect to make an cross, angles on opposite sides of the cross are called vertical angles. These angles are equal by the theorem that says Vertical angles are congruent.

⇒∠NQT ≅ ∠SQR

Therefore, the reason that justifies the step 2 :- ∠NQT ≅ ∠SQR is "Vertical angles are congruent" in the proof.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is 25/1000 grater than or less than 0.205
Usimov [2.4K]
Equal to, I think. Hope this helps.... If not sorry.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How do you put (x+5)(x-3)[x-(4-i)][x-(4+i)] into standard form
    9·1 answer
  • Every day Abby's teacher picks a number of the day from 1 to 20. The number of the day can be repeated. There are 180 days in th
    15·1 answer
  • What is a related equation with the variable on one side of the equation? 71=x−1471=x−14 Then simplify to solve the equation.
    5·1 answer
  • 1 hour
    11·2 answers
  • (tanx+sinx)(1-cosx)=sin^2xtanx
    11·1 answer
  • Use one of the triangles to approximate MO in the triangle below
    6·2 answers
  • Solve the following<br> a) 2x + 3) = x-4
    14·1 answer
  • 1/9 as a decimal. Round to the nearest thousandth
    8·2 answers
  • Someone please help me
    8·1 answer
  • Simplify the expression.<br> (In the picture)
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!