Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer:
c. pre-conventional morality
Explanation:
Preconventional morality is the first stage of moral development according to Kohlberg's model of moral development. It is the stage in which the children decides according to the consequences the actions will bring to them. The consequences which the behavior may is on the primary focus. In the above case, Finnian gives attention to the result before taking any of the steps.
Answer:
Change in M1 $400
Changd in M2 $0
Explanation:
The money which is been held by individuals in savings accounts is part of the M2 money supply, but its not part ofthe M1 money supply.
Hence when Jane withdraws $400 cash from her savings account,the M1 money supply will increases by $400. However, the M2 money supply does not tend to change reason been that the M1 money supply is included as part of the M2 money
Change in M1 $400
Changd in M2 $0
Answer:
cost-based transfer pricing
Explanation:
If the firm uses negociated rtansfer pricing they will stablish the transfer price based on manager bargain skill and leverage of each division. The CEO will not a grip on controlling cost across all dvisions, the managers will.
Therefore the best option is to go with a cost-based transfer pricing. The CEO can determinatethe method to determinate the cost and indriectly the cost across all divisions.
Refiners are in the secondary sector of the market because they are taking inputs and making them into products for consumption.
