The answer to the question is false that is not true.
<span><span>Large nameplate capacity per plant, typically around 1 GW.
</span><span>Typically 90% capacity factor, maximizing output from the nameplate capacity.
</span><span>Small fuel transportation volumes as the fissionable material just isn't that big or heavy compared to equivalent fossil fuel BTU sources.
</span><span>Low CO2 per MWH on a full life cycle basis. ~12 grams which is only slightly more than wind / solar.
This is a reason nuclear is a much better source for one of the major pressing problems of today than fossil fuels: global warming.</span>No particulate matter pollution.No sulfur dioxide or other chemical pollution.<span>Low fatalities per TWH.
Nuclear is higher than renewables according to current statistics, but much, much lower than fossil fuel generation.</span></span>
Nuclear power generates lots of clean, stable energy.
M1V1=M2V2
M1 * (650 ml) = 0.675 M *450 ml
M1= (0.675 M * 450 ml) / 650 ml
M1= 0.467 M
Answer:
mass and volume
Explanation:
Matter is anything that has mass and takes up space
After many years of pressure and possibly heat it will be compressed back into a form of rock such as sediment.
