Answer:
Interesting assignment. I really hope this helps! -
Explanation:
You are going to use the chart where he graphed the data on his hamster's diet to dissect and identify, the parts of this scientific method.
TIP - try to think of this in a first-person perspective meaning try to think of this as you doing the experiment.
Hope this helped understand this assignment. :)
If the producers were removed then there would be no beginning to the food chain and the complete ecosystem would die off. If the detrivores and decomposers were removed there would be no organic nutrients and all the dead plants would ruin the animals habitat.The ecosystem will be fill by plants and animal wastes as <span>there will be no decomposition of waste material.</span>
Answer:
A 50% chance I believe. The mother will always give the X chromosome and since the father is normal and doesn't carry that ressecive trait they can only get it from the mother. (I'm not completely sure!))
No they don't
For example humans. Technically humans are place below a wild predators such as sharks in trophic levels.
But the fact is we can eat sharks. So , organisms don't always stay in the same level
I don't think changing seasons can REMOVE CO2 from the air, but I do think instead it could add it to the air. It's a long process that involves several ecosystems and stuff. But, as the climate is getting warmer, ice caps are melting and within these ice caps... there are trapped bubbles of CO2 that are released ( I am not sure if this adds a lot of CO2 to the atmosphere, but I am sure that it does contribute to CO2 concentration).
In relation to your last statement... plant growth would actually reduce CO2 in the air because of the process of photosynthesis. Plants take in CO2 and give out O2 for us to breathe. In turn we conduct cellular respiration in which we take in the O2 and give out the CO2. So, plants are actually one good solution for decreasing CO2 levels.
