B.The quadratic formula is a good method because this quadratic equation cannot be easily factored.
you just have to get 2 over to the left side of the equation.
Answer:
12<x<16
Step-by-step explanation:
if c^2 > a^2 + b^2
then the triangle is obtuse
since 20 is the longest side
20^2 > x^2 + (x+4)^2
simplify
400 > x^2 + (x+4)(x+4)
FOIL
400 > (x^2 ) + (x^2 + 4x+4x+16)
combine like terms
400 > (2x^2 + 8x+16)
divide by 2
400/2 > 2x^2 /2 + 8x/2 + 16/2
200 > x^2 + 4x +8
subtract 200 from each side
0> x^2 + 4x +8-200
0> x^2 +4x-192
Factor
0 > (x-12) ( x+16)
using the zero product property
0> x-12 0 > x+16
12>x -16>x
x must be greater than 12
we know the longest side is 20
x+4 < 20
subtract 4
x< 16
x>12 and x < 16
12<x<16
Answer:
The sample consisting of 64 data values would give a greater precision.
Step-by-step explanation:
The width of a (1 - <em>α</em>)% confidence interval for population mean μ is:

So, from the formula of the width of the interval it is clear that the width is inversely proportion to the sample size (<em>n</em>).
That is, as the sample size increases the interval width would decrease and as the sample size decreases the interval width would increase.
Here it is provided that two different samples will be taken from the same population of test scores and a 95% confidence interval will be constructed for each sample to estimate the population mean.
The two sample sizes are:
<em>n</em>₁ = 25
<em>n</em>₂ = 64
The 95% confidence interval constructed using the sample of 64 values will have a smaller width than the the one constructed using the sample of 25 values.
Width for n = 25:
Width for n = 64:
![\text{Width}=2\cdot z_{\alpha/2}\cdot \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{64}}=\frac{1}{8}\cdot [2\cdot z_{\alpha/2}\cdot \sigma]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctext%7BWidth%7D%3D2%5Ccdot%20z_%7B%5Calpha%2F2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csigma%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B64%7D%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B8%7D%5Ccdot%20%5B2%5Ccdot%20z_%7B%5Calpha%2F2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csigma%5D)
Thus, the sample consisting of 64 data values would give a greater precision
Answer:
c
Step-by-step explanation:
At the 2/8 part, just use the quadratic formula. If you use it, you should get the other two zeroes:
