Answer:
The correct answer to: Patterns of Continuity and Change over Time using specific examples, analyze the extent to which the rise of capitalism presented a source of continuity or change between medieval and modern Europe.
Is:
True
Explanation:
why? well, patterns of continuity and Change over time are tools that combined provide us enough information to establish associations based on the variables observed. In our case, we would review the data whether it would be qualitative or quantitative. To establish an association of continuity or change over the two different systems and their respective dynamics. This all possible after understanding the data related to the different variables in the paradigm's dynamics. After observing the changes and continuity we would be able to deduct if the paradigm changed, provided a change or continuity. For example, we could say the following. In feudalism, the majority of wealth was held by the aristocrats. Then, we would come to nowadays data and find out that 10% o the people of the world possess more than 70% of the world's wealth and that from that 10% almost 60 to 70% have relationships with people in the international government. That suggests a continuity observable condition. However, if we consider that in feudalism not everyone had the chance to study medicine. While in recent times everyone can pursue medical studies. We could observe a change. So, in both cases qualitative and quantitative we can deduct or infer a certain continuity and change between both systems thanks to the patters data analysis of specific examples.
Age of 15 -19 years old women
Answer: President of the Republic of Cuba Presidente de la República de Cuba
Explanation:
just this
Answer:
States prefer block grants because it's like a chunk of money (not a super specific purpose, can use for more things, ie: 10,000 to Parks and Rec dept)
The government probably prefers to give categorical grants because they're more specific (towards one thing, ie: 10,000 to spend on park benches only)
