Answer: In a simple sense, growth in population is a good thing as it means that a species is thriving and doing well in its environment as well as reproducing at desirable rates. However, if population continues and continues to grow it will eventually reach a cap where an environment can no longer hold more members of that specific species because there is a limit on food and places of shelter. This leads to natural rises and declines in a species over time (which can be very predictable as well.) A downside to rapid and sustained population growth is that if a species keeps growing and growing without reaching its cap (which happens a lot with introduced species into an environment which were not there naturally) is that they can overrun and destroy a natural environment and damage the ecosystem. Animals and species which are already there can have their population numbers drastically reduced because of this invasive species and may be forced to move to a new area.
Answer:
We would be considered as one of the top predators.
Explanation:
There aren't many threats to humans at this point. We're omnivores, so we consume plants and meat. Humans are usually tertiary consumers, on the third trophic level, but sometimes can be on the second trophic level depending on the diagram.
This argument would not be valid because it fails to take into account the <u>mechanisms </u><u>through which </u><u>evolution </u><u>occurs</u> and misunderstands the <u>second law </u><u>of </u><u>thermodynamics</u><u>.</u>
The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy of a system must always increase. The argument stating that this law disproves evolution given that evolution can be considered as a <u>decrease in entropy</u>, fails to realize that the <em><u>second law</u></em> states that the <u>total entropy </u>must increase, this does not mean that entropy cannot decrease at one point, to then increase more so at another.
The other aspect of evolution that this argument fails to account for is that evolution is a chaotic process. Evolution, though having a final product that may be considered as increasing in organization, is at heart <u>a </u><u>chaotic process </u><u>caused by</u><u> random mutations</u><u> and the fragile process of </u><u>natural selection</u><u>.</u> Therefore, rather than disprove it, the<em><u> second law of thermodynamics</u></em> is actually the driving force behind continued evolution.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/7206767?referrer=searchResults
A phosphate group and single nitrogen containing based