No, I don't think we adequately account for the environmental impact in the cost that consumers pay for coal. <span>Consumers are paying much too low a price for coal-generated electricity, because the price they pay does not take account of the very large external costs associated with generation.</span>
No, that is completely impossible. The reasoning behind it is because if its a large group of fish they're swimming back and forth ect, ect, it would be like counting a bowl of rice, but not being able to take any out. To get around these counting problems, scientists take data from just a small portion of the population called a sample. They take several samples and then use the average size of those samples to calculate an estimate of the entire population size.
If you need help feel free to ask!
I’d go with c)
This is kind of controversial currently because there are different defintations of language but poplular opinion is tools first. Think apes are using rocks to open shells or something before they really communicate.
Size of brain definitely increased tho
