1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Annette [7]
4 years ago
5

One long-standing element of both international law and just war theory is the inviolability of civilians or noncombatants.

History
2 answers:
cupoosta [38]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The correct answer for: One long-standing element of both international law and just war theory is the inviolability of civilians or noncombatants. Is: True

Explanation:

Yes, it might seem difficult to understand but non-combatants are protected by law in war scenarios. Now, this is why certain war leaders are charged for the breakage of truces, human rights and crimes against humanity. Because they break the rules of war. Also, there are certain armies or forces like the ones provided by countries like Mexico, Brazil, The UN that send medics, builders, rescuers, firemen, etc. To help non-combatants involved in crossfire scenarios. They are not armed and wear distinctive of that status and if they are attacked it is a breakage of international war justice. One example of this was in the second world war when the Nazis attacked civilians and forces sent to help them.

Brrunno [24]4 years ago
4 0
This is true.

The just war theory had existed long before it was put into law. When it was put into law, it was done so with the Geneva conventions which had to be signed by countries and if countries did something against it, like kill civilians, they would get punished severely for war crimes and crimes against humanity. This is a key component of both practices. 
You might be interested in
Hitler wanted to dominate other countries because he believed what about germany's people?
Vladimir [108]
Hitler believed were the superior race in the world, or as he called them "The Arian Race"
3 0
3 years ago
The U.S. Constitution guarantees certain rights that allow people to engage in business activities. Which of the following does
mixas84 [53]
It is A<span>. the protection against monopolies and oligopolies 
</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Britain expand its empire by establishing colonies?
Nutka1998 [239]
Best answer is a. it wanted to spread its markets for trade really.
4 0
4 years ago
Pros and cons to loose constructionism
Montano1993 [528]
Pros- You can share and get people interested.
Cons- Some people will critizie what you try to do.
5 0
3 years ago
Who was Joseph Stallin and what did he do?
vlabodo [156]
Was the dictator of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and he <span>transformed from a peasant society into an industrial and military superpower. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the political consequences of the revolution in religion during the mid 1700s
    12·1 answer
  • Which is the BEST explanation for why the Northern economy was based on industry during the antebellum period? *
    13·1 answer
  • According to Marx and Engels, who will lead the communist revolution?1 the bourgeoisie 2government officials 3the proletariat 4e
    15·2 answers
  • Religious dissenters
    5·2 answers
  • What were some of the reforms Napoleon introduce
    11·1 answer
  • Under James Monroe, the United States expanded by:
    13·2 answers
  • How does Social Darwinism relate to militarism?
    13·1 answer
  • When Herbert Hoover took office in 1929, he brought to the presidency strong opposition to progressive ideals. decades of experi
    12·1 answer
  • Bond definition for us history
    12·2 answers
  • How did Westward Expansion change life for Native Americans?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!