which amendment outlawed the manufacture, sale, transportation, import, or export of alcoholic beverages?

How many illegal immigrants came to the u. S. In 2022.

Gwar [14]

The estimated illegal immigrants that came to the u. S. In 2022 were estimated to be about 11.35 million illegal immigrants.

<h3>How many legal immigrants enter US in 2022?</h3>

According to the estimate given, there were about 11.35 million, and this were those that doesn't follow the due process to move to the united state of America.

All these immigrants are usually after the greener pasture but were unable to secure the requirement to get across to united state which made them to follow illegal path.

Learn more about illegal immigrants here: brainly.com/question/14640138

#SPJ1

8 0

2 years ago

What factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation?

devlian [24]

The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that

The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.

For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means

There are two types of tortious interference

Tortious interference with contract
Tortious interference with good economic advantage.

Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project

From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:

The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct