Answer
When Barnaby Jack said, “Sometimes you have to demo a threat to spark a solution,” he meant that sometimes, if there isn't a problem, there would be no reason to find a solution. By demoing a threat, then there would show that there is room for a problem, meaning there needs to be a way to fix it.
Explanation
Done
The answer should be D-Learners license. From what I can tell, this is the Drivers license course. You don't need a high school diploma, you don't need a private pilots license, and I don't know of an ID card course. The Learners license in Florida must be held for 12 months before you can get your license.
I hope I've helped! :)
4 Major Instruments used for Making International Payments are Foreign Bills of Exchange; Bank Drafts; Telegraphic Transfer; Letter of Credit.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
To make payments in the foreign countries the instruments used are Foreign Bills of Exchange, Bank Drafts and Telegraphic Transfers and Letter of Credit. Each of these instruments mentioned as different methodologies in sending the money to the foreign banks.
Let us explain one by one; Foreign Bills of Exchange money drawn from country is payable at another country. Bank draft which is drawn on bank funds and payment assurance is made by the bank that issues it.
Telegraphic Transfer is an electronic method of fund transfer used mainly for overseas wire transactions. And final one is Letter of Credit is a letter given by the bank assuring that a buyer's payment to a seller will be received on time and for the correct amount.
Answer:
Democratic.
Explanation:
In the US, the two main political parties are the Republican and the Democrats. The Republicans are highly connected with a conservative agenda, often focusing on economic agenda in a nationalist bias. The democrats are also patriotic, but they tend to work on human rights struggle, usually working with the right of minority and social programs.
Answer:
Put simply, a criminal conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. The agreement itself is the crime, but at least one co-conspirator must take an “overt act” in furtherance of the conspiracy. Under the federal conspiracy statute: The agreement by two or more persons is the essence of the crime.
Explanation:
Our question is this: What makes an act one of entrapment? We make a standard distinction between legal entrapment, which is carried out by parties acting in their capacities as (or as deputies of) law-enforcement agents, and civil entrapment, which is not. We aim to provide a definition of entrapment that covers both and which, for reasons we explain, does not settle questions of permissibility and culpability. We explain, compare, and contrast two existing definitions of legal entrapment to commit a crime that possess this neutrality. We point out some problems with the extensional correctness of these definitions and propose a new definition that resolves these problems. We then extend our definition to provide a more general definition of entrapment, encompassing both civil and legal cases. Our definition is, we believe, closer to being extensionally correct and will, we hope, provide a clearer basis for future discussions about the ethics of entrapment than do the definitions upon which it improves.
