The correct answer is: marsupials.
Marsupials are actually defined by their ability to hold the young in the pouches, where they can be well protected. Some examples are Kangaroos and Koalas.
Other answers are wrong: for example, gymnosperms are plants, not animals.
<span>Gradually working towards bei g able to ve in enclosed spaces. The treatments might begin with such an excersise as being in a crowded room. Then decreasing the size of the room but allowing the same number of people. There are many proven methods to naturally desensatize to the anxiety caused by claustrophobia.</span>
Answer:
Removal of metabolic wastes
Explanation:
Answer:
a) 1/4 or 25%
b) 1/4 or 25%
c) 1/4 or 25%
d) 1/4 or 25%
Explanation:
<em>Both cataracts and bone fragility are dominant conditions and are independently inherited. Let cataracts allele be represented by C and fragile bone by B.</em>
A man with cataracts (CC or Cc) and normal bones (bb), whose father had normal eyes would have the genotype Ccbb. The cataract would be heterozygous because he had a normal eyes father. The affected allele must have been inherited from his mother.
A woman free from cataracts (cc) but with fragile bones (BB or Bb) whose father had normal bone would have the genotype ccBb. The fragile bone would be in heterozygous condition because she had a normal bone father. The affected allele must have been from the mother.
Ccbb x ccBb
<u>Offspring</u>
<em>4 CcBb - cataract eyes, fragile bone</em>
<em>4 ccBb - normal eyes, fragile bone</em>
<em>4 Ccbb - cataract eyes, normal bone</em>
<em>4 ccbb - normal eyes, normal bone</em>
a) Probability that their first child would be from both abnormalities = 4/16 or 1/4 or 25%
b) Probability that their first child would have cataracts but no fragile bones = 4/16 or 1/4 or 25%
c) Probability that their first child would have fragile bones but no cataracts = 4/16 or 1/4 or 25%
d) Probability that their first child would have both cataracts and fragile bones = 4/16 or 1/4 or 25%