1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wlad13 [49]
3 years ago
12

Who won the Ashcroft v American Civil Liberties Union case?

Law
2 answers:
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: ACLU: Supreme Court Maintains Ban on Censorship Law. The ACLU welcomed a federal appeals court ruling that a law meant to safeguard children against Internet porxxn would block lawful and valuable speech for adults.

Explanation:

german3 years ago
6 0
The court held 8-1 that the breadth of the community standards language did not in itself invalidate the law
You might be interested in
What are the 3 principles intentional peer support?
Andre45 [30]
Caring for relationships
3 0
2 years ago
Do economic sanctions hurt citizens?.
TEA [102]

Economic sanction hurt Citizens as warrants have been blamed on philanthropic grounds, as they negatively impact a nation's frugality and can also beget contributory damage on ordinary citizens.

<h3>What happens when a person is sanctioned? </h3>

When a person is sanctioned it must misbehave with OFAC regulations, including all U.S. citizens and endless occupant aliens anyhow of where they're located, all persons and realities within the United States, allU.S. incorporated realities and their foreign branches.

Warrants, in law and legal description, are penalties or other means of enforcement used to give impulses for obedience with the law, or with rules and regulations. Felonious warrants can take the form of serious discipline, similar as carnal or capital discipline, incarceration, or severe forfeitures.

Learn more about the Economic Sanction here: brainly.com/question/1591336

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
At which stage of a case proceeding does a court acquire in personam jurisdiction over a defendant?
DaniilM [7]

Answer:

Before the legal proceeding began.

Explanation:

In personam jurisdiction is the authority that the courts have to determine the personal rights and liabilities of the parties before the proceedings began. If this jurisdiction lacked from the court which attends the case then it wouldn´t have the authority to bind the defendant to an obligation or adjudicate rights over a property.

I hope this answer helps you.

3 0
3 years ago
Which amendment outlaws cruel and unusual punishment
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

8th

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What happens after both houses pass the exact same bill?
AnnZ [28]
The answer is a. It goes to a conference committee
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Outline the process by which most federal judges are nominated and approved
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a standard regulated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons
    14·2 answers
  • Which agency requires a college degree for employment?
    12·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST !!
    6·1 answer
  • If you could go anywhere in the world were would you go<br> mine trumps house
    14·1 answer
  • Crie algumas alternativas para combater a discriminação na nossa sociedade
    9·1 answer
  • Flashing blue lights are prohibited as their use is strictly reserved for which of these?
    9·1 answer
  • Should i ude the P90 on modern warfare?
    6·1 answer
  • Who elects or appoints Representative and Senators?
    8·1 answer
  • Briefly describe what Marks says in the beginning of his talk about conflict and compromise.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!