1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wlad13 [49]
3 years ago
12

Who won the Ashcroft v American Civil Liberties Union case?

Law
2 answers:
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: ACLU: Supreme Court Maintains Ban on Censorship Law. The ACLU welcomed a federal appeals court ruling that a law meant to safeguard children against Internet porxxn would block lawful and valuable speech for adults.

Explanation:

german3 years ago
6 0
The court held 8-1 that the breadth of the community standards language did not in itself invalidate the law
You might be interested in
When someone pleads insanity, what two things must they submit to the court?
VashaNatasha [74]

Answer:

They must submit that they didn't understand what they were doing or that they failed to know right from wrong or acted on an uncontrollable impulse.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hsjdhdvdjdudhdbdbdbdudhdhrjevehd
emmasim [6.3K]
You are absolutely right i agree
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The statute of frauds requires certain types of contracts to be in writing. All of these contracts must be in writing except
mixer [17]

Answer and explanation:

The statute of frauds requires certain types of contracts to be in writing, but there exceptions. One of those would be the situation of working for an employer for the rest of your life.

This is an oral employement contract scenario and doesn't necessarily must be written in order for it to be enforceable. For this contract to be, in fact, enforceable, the promise should be crystal clear about the employer's right to extinguish.

6 0
3 years ago
How much time do I need to pay for rapping a pigeon
kogti [31]

Answer:

5 - 6 Years

Explanation:

The pigeon wanted it.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain common law larceny by false pretenses and Modern Fraud laws.
Otrada [13]
The crime of False Pretenses is also known as Theft by False Pretenses or Larceny by False Pretenses. The crime of False Pretenses requires: a false representation. of a material fact (past or present) with the intent to defraud.

A crime at common law. The illegal taking of the property of another with intent to deprive the owner thereof.

The main difference between false pretenses and larceny is that a thief who secures title is guilty of false pretenses while someone who secures possession through fraud is guilty of larceny by trick.

Hope it helps you:)
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the first amendment
    8·2 answers
  • 3. Think about how our government functions today. If George Washington were still alive,
    11·1 answer
  • Parole officers are responsible for monitoring the activities of parolees; offenders recently released from prison. Traditionall
    13·1 answer
  • What his accounting in a business<br>​
    15·1 answer
  • In the One Leg Stand Test, the suspect is asked to ...
    12·1 answer
  • A police officer responds to a call about a young person with a gun sitting on a park bench. Upon arriving at the park in his cr
    7·1 answer
  • Why is documentation important at a crime scene?
    6·1 answer
  • How are congressional districts determined
    10·1 answer
  • One of the legal definitions of intoxication in texas
    7·1 answer
  • Do you think children should testify in a
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!