Answer: Principle of motion economy.
Explanation: principle of motion economy developed by Frank and Lillian Gilbreth are guidelines to help determine the work method, workplace layout, tools, and equipment.
The aim of this is to help in identifying and replicating one best way to complete a task and also minimize the physical and perceptual loads imposed on people engaged in that task.
Answer:
a) taking orders and performing repetitive tasks.
Explanation:
Samuel bowels and Herbert Gintis are widely known for their work on the sociology of education. Their book "Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reforms and Contradiction of Economic life" reflects how the structure of the capitalist workforce resembles the organization of schools. Their theory presented a view that the school system is a preparatory stage for a productive labor market. The hierarchy and discipline in schools prepare learners to be active labor force.
Answer:
to the nearest degree = 77°
Explanation:
This is a question under trigonometry
from the question we can find that The building is 210 feet tall and the length of its shadow is 50 feet.
The relationship between opposite and adjacent of the triangle is tan
Therefore tanθ = 
θ = tan⁻¹ 0.2380
= 13.39°
then we have to calculate the measure of the angle between the end of the shadow and the vertical side of the building , which is equal to
90 - 13.39=
=76.61°
to the nearest degree = 77°
Answer:
Explanation:
It definitely means that as the quality of education improves, it is directly proportional to the increase in productivity of labour or in other words , it means that as there is an increase in the quality of education, it is directly proportional to the increase of productivity of labour. As quality improves, productivity improves likewise. If quality of education decrease, then there is tendency that the productivity of labour will decrease., so therefore an increase in productivity of labour is a function of an increase in quality of education.
Because if no one could reason no one could make the invention we have today
