All categories

2 years ago

How did the McDonald brothers lose the Mcdonalds business?

Business

1 answer:

GuDViN [60]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Ray Kroc's initial franchising deal with the McDonald's brothers looked like this: a franchise fee of $950 with a 1.9 percent service fee assessed on food sales, 0.5 percent paid to the McDonald brothers as a royalty, and the remaining 1.4 percent going to Kroc. so only he lose . and pls add my in brainliest answer

You might be interested in

Which of the following statements is CORRECT?a. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take accoun

KIM [24]

Answer:

d. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take proper account of differences in the sizes of projects.

CORRECT As the project yields over time can differ. This generates that projects with a lower IRR can achieve a higher NPV at lower rates.

There is a crossover point after which a projects NPV are equal and from there the one with higher IRR obtains better NPV

Explanation:

a. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of the time value of money.

FALSE both method consider time value of money

b. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of the cost of capital

FALSE The IRR can be compared against the cost of capital to indicate wether or not a project should be preferable

.c. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR values a dollar received today the same as a dollar that will not be received until sometime in the future.

FALSE IRR considers the time value of money

e. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of cash flows over a project's full life.

FALSE it considers all the cash flows over the project's full life.

7 0

3 years ago

Sanders Inc. claims that it only uses organic cleaning products in its janitorial services. In reality, the company buys whateve

labwork [276]

Sanders Inc. claims that it only uses organic cleaning products in its janitorial services. In reality, the company buys whatever is cheapest in bulk. This is an example of greenwashing.

Greenwashing is the system of conveying a false impression or supplying deceptive facts approximately how an agency's products are more environmentally sound. Greenwashing is taken into consideration by an unsubstantiated claim to lie to purchasers into believing that a agency's merchandise is environmentally friendly.

Greenwashing additionally called "green sheen", is a form of advertising and marketing spin wherein green PR and green advertising is deceptively used to influence the general public that an agency's merchandise, ambitions, and rules are environmentally friendly.

A traditional instance of greenwashing is when Volkswagen admitted to dishonest emissions tests by becoming diverse cars with a “defect” tool, with a software program that might discover whilst it changed into undergoing an emissions test and altering the overall performance to reduce the emissions degree.

Learn more about greenwashing here brainly.com/question/21992794

#SPJ4

6 0

2 years ago

Firms that truly adopt the marketing concept develop a distinct organizational culture based on a shared set of beliefs that mak

natita [175]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Marketing is about to under understanding what generate values to the customer.

6 0

3 years ago

when an auditor of financial statements has substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern, the audi

tangare [24]

If information about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern is not disclosed in the financial statements, an auditor of financial statements is likely to express an adverse opinion.

<h3>Define a qualified or adverse opinion.</h3>

A remark made in an auditor's report that is attached to a company's audited financial statements is known as a qualified opinion. According to an auditor's judgment, a company's financial information may have been incomplete or there may have been a significant problem with how generally accepted accounting standards (GAAP) were applied, but the problem was not widespread.

With one or more exceptions, the financials often reflect the company's success and position. The financial statements are inaccurate or do not adhere to widely accepted accounting rules, in our opinion (GAAP).

To know more about qualified opinion, visit:

brainly.com/question/14310924

#SPJ1

7 0

1 year ago

at the end of the current year, using the aging of accounts receivable method, management estimated that $16,500 of the accounts

Furkat [3]

The adjusting entry that the company should pass at the end of the current year to record the bad debts expense:

Bad Debts Expense 16,900

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 16,900

<h3>What is an allowance for doubtful accounts?</h3>

A contra account called an allowance for doubtful accounts nets against the total receivables shown on the balance sheet to only show the amounts anticipated to be paid. The percentage of accounts receivable that are anticipated to be uncollectible is estimated by the allowance for doubtful accounts.

A negative balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts means that more accounts than anticipated have been written off. A contra asset account with a typical credit balance is the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Under the aging method, the adjusting entry for bad debt expense is calculated using the following formula:

Estimate of uncollectible accounts - (+) Current credit (debit) balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts = Bad debt expense

Hence, The adjusting entry that the company should pass at the end of the current year to record the bad debts expense is given above.

Learn more about the allowance for doubtful accounts:

brainly.com/question/17008094

#SPJ4

"Your question is incomplete, probably the complete question/missing part is:"

Bad Debts Expense 16,500

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 16,500

Bad Debts Expense 16,100

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 16,100

Bad Debts Expense 16,900

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 16,900

Accounts Receivable 16,500

Bad Debts Expense 400

Sales 16,900

Accounts Receivable 16,900

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 16,900

8 0

1 year ago