Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Based on the numbers, Nicaragua.
Federalism is a government in which powers are divided between state governments and a federal government
The answer is gender schema. This was a theory that presented by Sandra Bem in 1981 as an intellectual hypothesis to clarify how people progress toward becoming gendered in the public arena, and how sex-connected qualities are kept up and transmitted to different individuals from a culture.
