Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
Answer:
Amazon
Explanation:
You can look on amazon and im 99.9% sure that they will have it, good luck :)
Answer:
B). B
Explanation:
The use of ABC‐X model to analyse the stress and their coping within the families. The model includes (A) which is the the stressor event, (B) is the resources which is available to family, (C) is the family's view of the stressor, while (X) is the likelihood of crisis.
The ABC-X model is given by Hill in the year 1958. It starts with stressor and ends with crises.
In the context, Olga met with an accident. Olga's family have a well crisis meeting resources. As 'B' in the model stands for the resources of the family, in this question B is the crisis management resources.
Thus the answer is option (B)
You can't explain behavior by merely focusing on internal characteristics of a person such as being sadistic and cruel. Such behaviors were not exactly predisposition. They were heavily influenced by external factors like commands from a legitimate power such as Adolf Hitler. The Milgram experiment was actually inspired by the harsh acts of Germans during the WWII. People can actually go to extreme lengths, even if such acts are an attack of one's personal conscience, since they believe the legitimacy of a higher power, consequently making their actions legal or morally right even when it is not.
Answer:
minimize i took a test with this same question and i got it right, i hope this helps you
