Cognitive Dissonance is a False theory termed for the given scenario. The correct term for the given scenario is Drive reduction Theory.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Cognitive dissonance refers to someone's behaviour conflicts with their beliefs or attitudes which does not matches with the given scenario.
The drive reduction theory describes people’s drive or motivation to satisfy their desires. This drive or desire create arousal and tension emanating from biological or physiological needs. It means that people often experience drive or desires that increases negative needs.
Furthermore, unsatisfied desire also creates tension or unpleasant feeling that need to be reduced. The only thing that lowers the drivers is if one satisfy their needs or desire. As in the question, when we deny our sugar craving, it simply doesn’t go away, it builds up until it is satisfied.
Answer:
I'm 99% sure it's answer D state
Explanation:
The general consensus is that the Battle of Palmito Ranch was fought over a stockpile of cotton, which was bound to fetch a pretty penny at market.
The defeated Confederates decided to go for gold before having to surrender and end their racist war.
I believe the answer is <span>Posse Comitatus Act of 1879
the </span><span>Posse Comitatus Act of 1879 require abled bodied men over the age of 15 to help the sheriff in maintaining the security within a certain area if they're asked to. At the earliest years of the establishment of this act, people who fail to fulfill this request would received a 2 years jail punishment.</span>
Answer: Stress and coping.
Explanation:
The stress and coping paradigm suggest that stress is a distinct relationship between someone and the context that is evaluated by that individual as too demanding and possibly dangerous to their well-being. This model requires not only the consideration of stressors, as environmental demands but also the judgments and coping resources the person has to deal with those demands.