Answer:Decrease~ early in the period the kaibab forest had been overgrazed by sheep, cattle, and horses. The overgrazing reduced food to support a carry capacity of 30,000.
Explanation:
Answer:
A printing press is a device that squeezes ink onto paper or a fine print surface. The development and spread of the press was one of the most influential events of the second millennium as it created an intellectual and social revolution, marked the beginning of the mass media, and escorted the modern age. German Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press around 1440, when he created a screw press. A print press is used to publish books and newspapers. Over a period of time the word 'press' turned to mean not only the metal machine used, but also the company that used it; the word comes from the act of pressing the type against the surface of the paper.
Before the 14th century the usual method of printing information was by using blocks of wood, or etching material like leather. When Gutenberg invented folding to create mobile type, it became a much faster process, and thus commercially profitable.
The boston tea party was pretty much a <span>civil disobedience riot. They seen taxes placed on tea as a bad thing so they went rogue and threw the tea overboard, so this is true.</span>
In Roman society, the slaves were owned by the richer people. The slaves had to work doing various things such as manual labor and maid work. The slaves. Many times a person would become a slave because they owed money and would be a slave until all monies were returned to the owner.The had no legal rights and were not even allowed to vote.
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
